Physical features, coherence and positive outcomes of person–environment interactions: A virtual reality study

In this study we examined how physical features of a natural setting influenced perceived coherence and three positive outcome variables: preference, pleasure, and (self-reported) restoration. Furthermore, we examined the mediating role of perceived coherence. One hundred thirty-one students evaluated three (virtual) natural environments: an environment with metal furniture, an environment with wooden furniture, and an environment without furniture. Results showed that metal furniture negatively influenced perceived coherence as well as preference, pleasure and restoration, compared to wooden furniture and no furniture. Perceived coherence of the environment with wooden furniture was significantly higher than the environment with metal furniture, but significantly lower than the environment without furniture. We did not find support that preference for, and experienced pleasure and restoration in the environment with wooden furniture differed from the environment without furniture. Perceived coherence mediated the effect of (metal) furniture on preference, pleasure, and restoration. Scientific and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[2]  E. Shafer,et al.  Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model , 1969 .

[3]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  RATING SCALE MEASURES OF RESTORATIVE COMPONENTS OF ENVIRONMENTS , 2001 .

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes , 2000 .

[5]  G. Fry,et al.  Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration , 2009 .

[6]  T. Purcell,et al.  Why do Preferences Differ between Scene Types? , 2001 .

[7]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[8]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison , 2003 .

[9]  Terry C. Daniel,et al.  Predicting Scenic Values in Forested Residential Landscapes , 1984 .

[10]  Seung-Bin Im,et al.  Visual Preferences in Enclosed Urban Spaces , 1984 .

[11]  Rozemarijn Pals Zoo-ming in on restoration: Physical features and restorativeness of environments , 2012 .

[12]  R. Ulrich View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Jonides,et al.  The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature , 2008, Psychological science.

[15]  G. Evans,et al.  Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences , 1991 .

[16]  T. Gärling,et al.  Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. , 2003 .

[17]  H. Staats,et al.  Where to recover from attentional fatigue : An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference , 2003 .

[18]  D. S. Davis,et al.  Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. , 2003 .

[19]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[20]  F. Siero,et al.  Development of the PRCQ: A measure of perceived restorative characteristics of zoo attractions , 2009 .

[21]  S. Koole,et al.  Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? , 2003 .

[22]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Virtual Laboratories: Comparability of Real and Virtual Environments for Environmental Psychology , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  S. Kaplan Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue , 2001 .

[24]  E. Strumse Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway , 1994 .

[25]  R. Berto Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity , 2005 .

[26]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Effect of Urban Vegetation on Psychological Restorativeness , 2005, Psychological reports.

[27]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  T. R. Herzog,et al.  A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature , 1989 .