Liquid dynamics: challenges for sustainability in the water domain

Water is essential for human well-being and is a basic asset for productive livelihoods in many developing countries. It is also key to realizing most of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Although the water MDG was met in 2010, 768 million people around the globe still lack access to safe and adequate water. Huge disparities continue to exist in access between rural and urban areas and rich and poor, as well as inherent social and gender inequalities. We argue that debates about access have so far paid insufficient attention to the long-term sustainability of systems and services for accessing water. They have also neglected issues concerning uncertainty and social, environmental, and technological dynamics—particularly through addressing power imbalances and enhancing equity. There are two main reasons for this. One, discourses on access tend to be globalized and general, often disconnected from people's lived realities. Two, the dynamic interaction among social, technical, and ecological/hydrological dimensions of water across multiple scales is not adequately taken account of. There is a variety of different pathways in which water systems of access might develop. There are also multiple understandings and framings of water, and the gathering of knowledge about such diverse understandings implies that appraisal of access needs to broaden up to include a wider range of perspectives to inform policy and political discourse. We thus introduce the concept of ‘Liquid Dynamics’ to capture an understanding of sustainability that takes on board issues of uncertainty, complexity, local knowledge, equity, gender, and power relations. WIREs Water 2014, 1:369–384. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1031 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website. Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

[1]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  IA special issue EMS , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  D. Watkins,et al.  Metrics for Sustainable Water Use , 2004 .

[3]  A. Allen Neither Rural nor Urban: Service Delivery Options That Work for the Peri-urban Poor , 2010 .

[4]  Á. Aradóttir,et al.  Cultivating communication : participatory approaches in land restoration in Iceland , 2013 .

[5]  B. Pfaffenberger Social Anthropology of Technology , 1992 .

[6]  M Falkenmark,et al.  Population and water resources: a delicate balance. , 1992, Population bulletin.

[7]  A. Biswas Integrated Water Resources Management: A Reassessment , 2004 .

[8]  Ariel Dinar,et al.  Institutional changes in global water sector: trends, patterns, and implications ☆ , 2000 .

[9]  A. Ioris Scarcity, Neoliberalism and the ‘Water Business’ in Lima, Peru , 2012 .

[10]  José Esteban Castro,et al.  Neoliberal water and sanitation policies as a failed development strategy , 2008 .

[11]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[12]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Global Water Governance: Challenges and Future Scope Missing Links in Global Water Governance: a Processes-Oriented Analysis , 2013 .

[13]  J. Manor,et al.  Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance , 1998 .

[14]  P. Drechsel,et al.  Integrating “livelihoods” into integrated water resources management: taking the integration paradigm to its logical next step for developing countries , 2005 .

[15]  C. Rio,et al.  Scaling up Multiple Use Water Services , 2014 .

[16]  Geoffrey T. McDonald,et al.  Critical review of Integrated Water Resources Management: moving beyond polarised discourse. , 2009 .

[17]  K. Bakker The “Commons” Versus the “Commodity”: Alter‐globalization, Anti‐privatization and the Human Right to Water in the Global South , 2007 .

[18]  Synne Movik Return of the Leviathan? Hydropolitics in the developing world revisited , 2010 .

[19]  Victoria Reyes-García,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Adaptation to Global Environmental Change: North and South Perspectives Traditional ecological knowledge among transhumant pastoralists in Mediterranean Spain , 2013 .

[20]  J. Dávila,et al.  The peri-urban water poor: citizens or consumers? , 2006 .

[21]  Balgis OsmanElasha Putting the global extremes and disasters in the context of the IPCC special report on managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (SREX) , 2014 .

[22]  Sarah Bell,et al.  Glass half empty? Urban water poverty halfway through the Decade of Water for Life , 2011 .

[23]  C Hamlin,et al.  Edwin Chadwick and the Engineers, 1842—1854: Systems and Antisystems in the Pipe-and-Brick Sewers War , 1992, Technology and culture.

[24]  A. Dinar,et al.  Integrated River Basin Management through Decentralization , 2007 .

[25]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of near‐bed hydraulics above a patch of river gravel , 2006 .

[26]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[27]  D. Brooks,et al.  Water scarcity: An alternative view and its implications for policy and capacity building , 2003 .

[28]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  B. Koppen Dispossession at the interface of community-based water law and permit systems , 2007 .

[30]  Lyla Mehta,et al.  The Global Politics of Water Grabbing , 2013 .

[31]  K. Bakker,et al.  Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm , 2012 .

[32]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know , 2008 .