Isogeometric configuration design optimization of heat conduction problems using boundary integral equation

Abstract The shape variation of a domain naturally results in both shape and orientation variations, so called configuration variation, when employing a boundary integral equation (BIE) method. A configuration design sensitivity analysis (DSA) method is developed for steady state heat conduction problems using the boundary integral equations in an isogeometric approach, where NURBS basis functions in a CAD system are directly utilized in the response analysis. Thus, we can accomplish a seamless incorporation of exact geometry and the higher continuity into a computational framework. To enhance the accuracy of configuration design sensitivity, the CAD-based higher-order geometric information such as normal and tangent vectors is exactly embedded in the design sensitivity expressions. The necessary velocity field for configuration design obtained from the NURBS is analytically decomposed into shape and orientation velocity fields. It is shown to be essential to consider orientation variations and significant for accurate configuration sensitivity through comparison with finite differencing conventional BIE method. The developed isogeometric configuration DSA method turns out to be accurate compared with the analytic solution and the conventional DSA method. During the optimization, a mesh regularization scheme is employed to avoid excessive mesh distortion, which comes from significant design changes.

[1]  C. Brebbia,et al.  Boundary Elements IX , 1987 .

[2]  G. T. Symm,et al.  Integral equation methods in potential theory. II , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  Shape sensitivity analysis for nonlinear steadystate heat conduction problems , 1996 .

[4]  B. Kwak,et al.  Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Elliptic Problems in Boundary Integral Equation Formulation , 1988 .

[5]  K. Choi,et al.  A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design , 1994 .

[6]  J. Telles A self-adaptive co-ordinate transformation for efficient numerical evaluation of general boundary element integrals , 1987 .

[7]  Seonho Cho,et al.  Isogeometric shape design sensitivity analysis using transformed basis functions for Kronecker delta property , 2013 .

[8]  Byung Man Kwak,et al.  Boundary integral equation method for shape optimization of elastic structures , 1988 .

[9]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Shape and topology design for heat conduction by Evolutionary Structural Optimization , 1999 .

[10]  Kang Li,et al.  Isogeometric analysis and shape optimization via boundary integral , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  Seung-Hyun Ha,et al.  Isogeometric shape design optimization: exact geometry and enhanced sensitivity , 2009 .

[12]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  A two-dimensional Isogeometric Boundary Element Method for elastostatic analysis , 2012 .

[13]  M. Guiggiani,et al.  Direct computation of Cauchy principal value integrals in advanced boundary elements , 1987 .

[14]  M. A. Jaswon Integral equation methods in potential theory. I , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Chin-Hsiang Cheng, Chun-Yin Wu AN APPROACH COMBINING BODY-FITTED GRID GENERATION AND CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHODS FOR SHAPE DESIGN IN HEAT CONDUCTION PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[16]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[17]  Seung-Hyun Ha,et al.  Isogeometric shape design optimization of heat conduction problems , 2013 .

[18]  T. A. Cruse,et al.  Numerical solutions in three dimensional elastostatics , 1969 .

[19]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  First‐order design sensitivities for transient conduction problems by an adjoint method , 1989 .

[20]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND OPTIMAL DESIGN OF EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES AND INTERFACES FOR HEAT CONDUCTION SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[21]  D. F. Rogers,et al.  An Introduction to NURBS: With Historical Perspective , 2011 .

[22]  Krzysztof Dems,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR STEADY CONDUCTION PROBLEM WITH RADIATIVE HEAT TRANSFER , 2005 .

[23]  Kai Hormann,et al.  Surface Parameterization: a Tutorial and Survey , 2005, Advances in Multiresolution for Geometric Modelling.

[24]  W. Wall,et al.  Isogeometric structural shape optimization , 2008 .

[25]  Xiaoping Qian,et al.  Full analytical sensitivities in NURBS based isogeometric shape optimization , 2010 .

[26]  S. Nintcheu Fata,et al.  Treatment of domain integrals in boundary element methods , 2012 .

[27]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear thermal systems , 1989 .

[28]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Some identities for fundamental solutions and their applications to weakly-singular boundary element formulations , 1991 .

[29]  Seonho Cho,et al.  Topological Shape Optimization of Heat Conduction Problems using Level Set Approach , 2005 .

[30]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems , 1986 .