Deep feature classification of angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma in abdominal contrast‐enhanced CT images with texture image patches and hand‐crafted feature concatenation

PURPOSE To develop an automatic deep feature classification (DFC) method for distinguishing benign angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) from malignant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from abdominal contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CE CT) images. METHODS A dataset including 80 abdominal CT images of 39 AMLwvf and 41 ccRCC patients was used. We proposed a DFC method for differentiating the small renal masses (SRM) into AMLwvf and ccRCC using the combination of hand-crafted and deep features, and machine learning classifiers. First, 71-dimensional hand-crafted features (HCF) of texture and shape were extracted from the SRM contours. Second, 1000-4000-dimensional deep features (DF) were extracted from the ImageNet pretrained deep learning model with the SRM image patches. In DF extraction, we proposed the texture image patches (TIP) to emphasize the texture information inside the mass in DFs and reduce the mass size variability. Finally, the two features were concatenated and the random forest (RF) classifier was trained on these concatenated features to classify the types of SRMs. The proposed method was tested on our dataset using leave-one-out cross-validation and evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). In experiments, the combinations of four deep learning models, AlexNet, VGGNet, GoogleNet, and ResNet, and four input image patches, including original, masked, mass-size, and texture image patches, were compared and analyzed. RESULTS In qualitative evaluation, we observed the change in feature distributions between the proposed and comparative methods using tSNE method. In quantitative evaluation, we evaluated and compared the classification results, and observed that (a) the proposed HCF + DF outperformed HCF-only and DF-only, (b) AlexNet showed generally the best performances among the CNN models, and (c) the proposed TIPs not only achieved the competitive performances among the input patches, but also steady performance regardless of CNN models. As a result, the proposed method achieved the accuracy of 76.6 ± 1.4% for the proposed HCF + DF with AlexNet and TIPs, which improved the accuracy by 6.6%p and 8.3%p compared to HCF-only and DF-only, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The proposed shape features and TIPs improved the HCFs and DFs, respectively, and the feature concatenation further enhanced the quality of features for differentiating AMLwvf from ccRCC in abdominal CE CT images.

[1]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[2]  D. Holanda,et al.  Characterization of renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma by unenhanced, nephrographic, and delayed phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography. , 2015, Clinical imaging.

[3]  R. Ghavamian,et al.  Imaging characteristics of minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with histologic correlations. , 2005, Urology.

[4]  Wei Shen,et al.  Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Networks for Lung Nodule Classification , 2015, IPMI.

[5]  Mark W. Ball,et al.  Grade heterogeneity in small renal masses: potential implications for renal mass biopsy. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[6]  B. Trock,et al.  Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (≤4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. , 2012, Urology.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[8]  W. Rathmell,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Qingmao Hu,et al.  Lung nodule classification using deep feature fusion in chest radiography , 2017, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  M Jayson,et al.  Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. , 1998, Urology.

[11]  Lifen Yan,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[12]  Matthew S Davenport,et al.  Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  Jeong Kon Kim,et al.  Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT? , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  J. Cho,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[17]  Jeong Kon Kim,et al.  MDCT-based scoring system for differentiating angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma , 2013, Acta radiologica.

[18]  Shu-Huei Shen,et al.  Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[20]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Zheng Yuan,et al.  Lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma: Differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma using wash-in and washout characteristics on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. , 2016, Oncology letters.

[22]  Coral L. Atoria,et al.  Management of Small Kidney Cancers in the New Millennium: Contemporary Trends and Outcomes in a Population-Based Cohort. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[23]  A. Naraghi,et al.  Pitfalls and pearls in MRI of the knee. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  J. Cho,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[25]  Xin Yang,et al.  Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Nicola Schieda,et al.  Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images? , 2015, Radiology.

[27]  Junmo Kim,et al.  Differentiation of fat‐poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast‐enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification , 2017, Medical physics.

[28]  M. McInnes,et al.  Unenhanced CT for the diagnosis of minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[31]  J. Cho,et al.  Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Steven S Raman,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  The Automated Learning of Deep Features for Breast Mass Classification from Mammograms , 2016, MICCAI.