The Perception of Naturalness Correlates with Low-Level Visual Features of Environmental Scenes

Previous research has shown that interacting with natural environments vs. more urban or built environments can have salubrious psychological effects, such as improvements in attention and memory. Even viewing pictures of nature vs. pictures of built environments can produce similar effects. A major question is: What is it about natural environments that produces these benefits? Problematically, there are many differing qualities between natural and urban environments, making it difficult to narrow down the dimensions of nature that may lead to these benefits. In this study, we set out to uncover visual features that related to individuals' perceptions of naturalness in images. We quantified naturalness in two ways: first, implicitly using a multidimensional scaling analysis and second, explicitly with direct naturalness ratings. Features that seemed most related to perceptions of naturalness were related to the density of contrast changes in the scene, the density of straight lines in the scene, the average color saturation in the scene and the average hue diversity in the scene. We then trained a machine-learning algorithm to predict whether a scene was perceived as being natural or not based on these low-level visual features and we could do so with 81% accuracy. As such we were able to reliably predict subjective perceptions of naturalness with objective low-level visual features. Our results can be used in future studies to determine if these features, which are related to naturalness, may also lead to the benefits attained from interacting with nature.

[1]  F. Mayer,et al.  Why Is Nature Beneficial? , 2009 .

[2]  J. Jonides,et al.  The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  Ieee Xplore,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Information for Authors , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[5]  R. Ulrich.  View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. , 1984, Science.

[6]  David Mumford,et al.  Statistics of natural images and models , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[7]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[8]  D. Ruderman.  The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[9]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Aggression and Violence in the Inner City , 2001 .

[10]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Cognitive Set and the Perception of Place , 1981 .

[11]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  David L Ronis,et al.  An Environmental Intervention to Restore Attention in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer , 2003, Cancer nursing.

[15]  N. Jaworska,et al.  A Review of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and its Utility in Various Psychological Domains , 2009 .

[16]  F. E. Kuo,et al.  Environment and Crime in the Inner City , 2001 .

[17]  V. Noreika,et al.  Environmental Psychology , 2018 .

[18]  R. Baddeley,et al.  A statistical analysis of natural images matches psychophysically derived orientation tuning curves , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  S C Strother,et al.  Functional connectivity metrics during stroke recovery. , 2010, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[20]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework , 1995 .

[21]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[22]  R. Berto.  Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity , 2005 .

[23]  L M Ward,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling Of The Molar Physical Environment. , 1977, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Age-group differences in cognition of the molar physical environment: A multidimensional scaling approach. , 1980 .

[25]  Pietro Perona,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[26]  Reinhard Klette,et al.  Handbook of image processing operators , 1996 .

[27]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Pattern classification of fMRI data: Applications for analysis of spatially distributed cortical networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[28]  Ethan Kross,et al.  Dimensionality of brain networks linked to life-long individual differences in self-control , 2012, Nature Communications.

[29]  Frances E. Kuo,et al.  Children With Attention Deficits Concentrate Better After Walk in the Park , 2009, Journal of attention disorders.

[30]  M. Berman,et al.  Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[31]  D. Field,et al.  Estimates of the information content and dimensionality of natural scenes from proximity distributions. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[32]  Ethan Kross,et al.  Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. , 2012, Journal of affective disorders.

[33]  David J. Field,et al.  Wavelets, vision and the statistics of natural scenes , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  Leslie S. Smith,et al.  The principal components of natural images , 1992 .

[35]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  E. Wilson,et al.  The biophilia hypothesis , 1993 .

[37]  Jean Doyen,et al.  Ranks of incidence matrices of Steiner triple systems , 1978 .

[38]  Florin Cutzu,et al.  Differences of edge properties in photographs and paintings , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[39]  Willem J. Heiser,et al.  PROXSCAL: A Multidimensional Scaling Program for Individual Differences Scaling with Constraints , 2014 .

[40]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[41]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Biophilia. Harvard University Press. , 1984 .

[42]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling , 2003, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[43]  D Kersten,et al.  Predictability and redundancy of natural images. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[44]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[45]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[46]  R. Goldstone.  An efficient method for obtaining similarity data , 1994 .