Load Control for Turbine Blades: A Non-Traditional Microtab Approach

Active flow control and load mitigation concepts developed for traditional aeronautical applications have potential to decrease torque, bending and fatigue loads on wind turbine blades and to help increase turbine life. Much of the early work in flow control focused on steady aerodynamic benefits. More recent technologies have focused on unsteady flow control techniques which require a deeper understanding of the underlying flow physics as well as sensors to record the various time-dependent aerodynamic phenomena and fast actuators for control. This paper identifies some developmental control concepts for load mitigation along with a new translational microfabricated tab concept available for active flow and load control on lifting surfaces and explores their applicability for wind turbine rotor blades. Specifically, this paper focuses on experimental results based on an innovative microtab approach for unsteady, active load control. Previous papers on this effort by Yen et al. focused on the multi-disciplinary design methodology and the significant lift enhancement achieved using these micro-scale devices. The current research extends the effort to include dynamic results with discontinuous tab effects, effects on drag, and lower (pressure side) and upper surface (suction side) tab deployment effects for the prototype airfoil as well as for the S809, a representative wind turbine airfoil. Results show that the microtab concept can provide macro-scale load changes and is capable of offering active control of lift and drag forces for load alleviation.Copyright © 2002 by D. T. Yen Nakafuji et al. and ASME

[1]  A. Betz.  A Method for the Direct Determination of Wing-Section Drag , 1925 .

[2]  Stuart S. Ochs,et al.  CFD calculations of S809 aerodynamic characteristics , 1997 .

[3]  Peter Hauge Madsen,et al.  Predicting Ultimate Loads for Wind Turbine Design , 1998 .

[4]  Scott D. Collins,et al.  Active Load Control for Airfoils using Microtabs , 2001 .

[5]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Wind-Tunnel Investigations of Wings with Serrated Sharp Trailing Edges , 1989 .

[6]  D. M. Somers,et al.  Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil , 1997 .

[7]  Sally A. Viken,et al.  Advanced Aerodynamic Design of Passive Porosity Control Effectors , 2001 .

[8]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  ACTIVE LOAD CONTROL FOR WIND TURBINE BLADES USING MEM TRANSLATIONAL TABS , 2001 .

[9]  John Lin.  Control of turbulent boundary-layer separation using micro-vortex generators , 1999 .

[10]  John G Lowry.  Data on spoiler-type ailerons , 1953 .

[11]  Dora Te-Lun Yen.  Active load control using microtabs , 2001 .

[12]  Ronald D. Joslin,et al.  Transitioning Active Flow Control to Applications , 1999 .

[13]  Holger Hanselka,et al.  Design aspects of the adaptive wing — the elastic trailing edge and the local spoiler bump , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[14]  F. S. Stoddard,et al.  Wind turbine aerodynamics research needs assessment , 1986 .

[15]  Knut Ronold,et al.  Ultimate Loading of Wind Turbines , 1999 .

[16]  Robert F. Kunz,et al.  Flow control technology readiness: Aerodynamic versus hydrodynamic , 2000 .

[17]  Guy Dumas,et al.  Gurney Flap Scaling for Optimum Lift-to-Drag Ratio , 1997 .

[18]  Robert G. Bryant,et al.  Development of synthetic jet actuators for active flow control at NASA Langley , 2000 .

[19]  Robert J. Englar,et al.  Circulation Control Pneumatic Aerodynamics: Blown Force and Moment Augmentation and Modification; Pa , 2000 .

[20]  R. A. McD. Galbraith.  The aerodynamic characteristics of a GU25-5(11)8 aerofoil for low Reynolds numbers , 1985 .

[21]  Kazuhiro Kusunose,et al.  Physical Properties of Maskell's Induced Drag Integral , 2001 .

[22]  Paul S. Veers,et al.  Aeroelastic tailoring in wind-turbine blade applications , 1998 .

[23]  Don W. Lobitz,et al.  Load mitigation with twist-coupled HAWT blades , 1999 .

[24]  Avi Seifert,et al.  Use of Piezoelectric Actuators for Airfoil Separation Control , 1998 .