Flight Test Evaluation of Synthetic Vision Concepts at a Terrain Challenged Airport

NASA's Synthetic Vision Systems (SVS) Project is striving to eliminate poor visibility as a causal factor in aircraft accidents as well as enhance operational capabilities of all aircraft through the display of computer generated imagery derived from an onboard database of terrain, obstacle, and airport information. To achieve these objectives, NASA 757 flight test research was conducted at the Eagle-Vail, Colorado airport to evaluate three SVS display types (Head-up Display, Head-Down Size A, Head-Down Size X) and two terrain texture methods (photo-realistic, generic) in comparison to the simulated Baseline Boeing-757 Electronic Attitude Direction Indicator and Navigation/Terrain Awareness and Warning System displays. The results of the experiment showed significantly improved situation awareness, performance, and workload for SVS concepts compared to the Baseline displays and confirmed the retrofit capability of the Head-Up Display and Size A SVS concepts. The research also demonstrated that the tunnel guidance display concept used within the SVS concepts achieved required navigation performance (RNP) criteria.

[1]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  EFFECT OF PATHWAY-IN-THE-SKY AND SYNTHETIC TERRAIN IMAGERY ON SITUATION AWARENESS IN A SIMULATED LOW-LEVEL INGRESS SCENARIO , 1999 .

[2]  J. Raymond Comstock,et al.  Can Effective Synthetic Vision System Displays be Implemented on Limited Size Display Spaces , 2004 .

[3]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  Testing a Subjective Metric of Situation Awareness , 1991 .

[4]  Betsy Cann.  Led Down the Garden Path , 1986 .

[5]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  CFIT prevention using synthetic vision , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  Human Factors in Head-Up Synthetic Vision Displays , 2001 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays for Aviation: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison , 1993 .

[8]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[9]  Peter B. Ladkin.  Risks of technological remedy , 1997 .

[10]  V Parrish Russell,et al.  Spatial Awareness Comparisons Between Large-Screen, Integrated Pictorial Displays and Conventional EFIS Displays During Simulated Landing Approaches , 2003 .

[11]  David Woods,et al.  Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon , 1991 .

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[13]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Lynne M. Coventry,et al.  Human Factors , 2010, Handbook of Financial Cryptography and Security.

[15]  Earl L. Wiener.  Controlled Flight into Terrain Accidents: System-Induced Errors , 1977 .

[16]  R. Davis,et al.  The Human Operator as a Single Channel Information System , 1957 .

[17]  James A. Jeske,et al.  Flight Path Synthesis and HUD Scaling for V/STOL Terminal Area Operations , 1995 .

[18]  G. Klein,et al.  Sources of Error in Naturalistic Decision Making Tasks , 1993 .

[19]  E. Theunissen.  Integrated design of a man-machine interface for 4-D navigation , 1997 .

[20]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Display Principles, Control Dynamics, and Environmental Factors in Pilot Training and Transfer , 1990 .

[21]  M C Waller,et al.  CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS AIRCRAFT SYNTHETIC VISION SYSTEMS , 2001 .

[22]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  Causes and Remedies of Controlled Flight into Terrain in Military and Civil Aviation , 1999 .

[23]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  A Preliminary Examination of Situation Awareness and Pilot Performance in a Synthetic Vision Environment , 2001 .

[24]  F. Yuan,et al.  SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) , 1999 .

[25]  S Vandebuerie,et al.  OUT OF THE LOOP , 2004 .

[26]  Lynda J. Kramer,et al.  Flight Test Comparison of Synthetic Vision Display Concepts at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 2003 .

[27]  Abuse.  Humans and Automation : Use , Misuse , Disuse , , 2008 .

[28]  L J Prinzel,et al.  Synthetic Vision Systems , 2009 .

[29]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Synthetic Vision Enhances Situation Awareness and RNP Capabilities for Terrain-Challenged Approaches , 2003 .

[30]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  J Pollet.  [Crow's feet]. , 1973, Annales de chirurgie plastique.

[32]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[33]  Kevin W. Williams,et al.  Impact of Aviation Highway-in-the-Sky Displays on Pilot Situation Awareness , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Workload: An examination of the concept. , 1986 .

[35]  Randall E. Bailey,et al.  Technical Challenges in the Development of a NASA Synthetic Vision System Concept , 2002 .

[36]  Charles E. Billings,et al.  Aviation Automation: The Search for A Human-centered Approach , 1996 .

[37]  William H. Corwin,et al.  Subjective results of a simulator evaluation using synthetic terrain imagery presented on a helmet-mounted display , 1994, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[38]  Richard S. Jensen,et al.  Pilot Judgment and Crew Resource Management , 1995 .