High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior

This study aimed to investigate the process that leads people to offer or omit help in response to an explicit request for assistance, taking into account both emotional and cognitive factors. Specifically, a hypothetical scenario methodology was used in a sample of 174 Italian youths (50% males) to examine whether and how factors such as empathy, prosocial moral reasoning and moral disengagement influence the propensity to help when providing assistance is not in the individual’s personal interest. While a few previous studies have included moral disengagement as an antecedent of prosocial decision making, we highlight the significance of this factor in the avoidance of moral responsibility towards others in need. The results highlight two ways in which differences in emotional tendencies and moral-cognitive processes may operate in prosocial decision making in high personal cost situations. First, high empathy levels could promote an altruistic response which in turn fosters mature prosocial moral reasoning. Second, personal distress may enhance moral disengagement mechanisms that may facilitate self-centred behaviors.

[1]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Encouraging Words Concerning the Evidence for Altruism , 1991 .

[2]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. , 1991 .

[3]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior , 1986 .

[4]  G. Carlo,et al.  The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents , 2002 .

[5]  L. Hyde,et al.  Developmental Precursors of Moral Disengagement and the Role of Moral Disengagement in the Development of Antisocial Behavior , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[6]  Granville Bud Potter,et al.  The EQUIP Program. Teaching Youth To Think and Act Responsibly through a Peer-Helping Approach. , 1999 .

[7]  G. Carlo,et al.  Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. , 2010 .

[8]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[9]  J. Decety,et al.  Empathy versus personal distress: Recent evidence from social neuroscience. , 2009 .

[10]  C. Batson,et al.  Distress and empathy: two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. , 1987, Journal of personality.

[11]  G. Carlo,et al.  Sociocognitive and Behavioral Correlates of a Measure of Prosocial Tendencies for Adolescents , 2003 .

[12]  Qing Zhou,et al.  Prosocial development in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  M. Hoffman Empathy and moral development : implications for caring and justice , 2000 .

[14]  J. Decety,et al.  The human mirror neuron system in a population with deficient self‐awareness: An fMRI study in alexithymia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Peggy Estrada Adolescents' Self-Report of Prosocial Responses to Friends and Acquaintances: The Role of Sympathy-Related Cognitive, Affective, and Motivational Processes , 1995 .

[16]  Paolo Albiero,et al.  Contributo all'adattamento italiano dell'Interpersonal Reactivity Index. , 2006 .

[17]  A Bandura,et al.  Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  J. Smetana,et al.  Thought, Emotions, and Social Interactional Processes in Moral Development , 2006 .

[19]  Marinella Paciello,et al.  Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. , 2008, Child development.

[20]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: a longitudinal study. , 1999, Child development.

[21]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  An Objective Measure of Adolescents' Prosocial Moral Reasoning , 1992 .

[22]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[23]  L. Treviño,et al.  Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: a study of antecedents and outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.