Construction of Efficient Heterogeneous Choice Designs: A New Approach

Extant research on choice designs in marketing focuses on the construction of efficient homogeneous designs where all respondents get the same design. Sandor and Wedel (2005) were the first to propose the construction of efficient heterogeneous designs where different respondents or groups of respondents get different subdesigns, and demonstrate substantial efficiency gain when such heterogeneous designs are employed. A significant hurdle in widespread adoption of heterogeneous designs is the high computation cost, even when the number of subdesigns contained in the heterogeneous design is restricted to be small. In this paper we propose a new approach for the construction of efficient heterogeneous choice designs. In contrast to extant approaches that are based on an exact design framework where it is computationally prohibitive to do an exhaustive search to find a globally optimal design, our proposed approach is based on the continuous design framework where well-established mathematical theories can be leveraged for quick identification of a globally optimal design. The proposed approach makes it feasible to generate a highly efficient choice design that is completely heterogeneous -- a unique subdesign for each individual respondent in the choice experiment. The proposed approach is the first in the marketing literature to find a completely heterogeneous choice design with assured high global design efficiency using the continuous design framework. Results from simulation and empirical studies demonstrate superior performance of the proposed approach over extant approaches in constructing efficient heterogeneous choice designs.

[1]  Min Ding,et al.  Barter Markets for Conjoint Analysis , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models , 2006 .

[3]  J. Swait,et al.  The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching , 2001 .

[4]  Mark J. Garratt,et al.  Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications , 1994 .

[5]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Bayesian Designs for Hierarchical Linear Models , 2009 .

[6]  R. K. Meyer,et al.  The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs , 1995 .

[7]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Forecasting with Conjoint Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  M. Wedel,et al.  Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs , 2001 .

[9]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS , 2007 .

[10]  John Stufken,et al.  SUPPORT POINTS OF LOCALLY OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR NONLINEAR MODELS WITH TWO PARAMETERS , 2009, 0903.0728.

[11]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[12]  Peter Goos,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Constructing Bayesian Optimal Choice Designs , 2009 .

[13]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[14]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2004 .

[15]  M. Wedel,et al.  The No—Choice Alternative in Conjoint Choice Experiments , 2001 .

[16]  Johann Füller,et al.  Measuring Consumer Preferences Using Conjoint Poker , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Min Ding An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Jie Yu,et al.  Model-Robust Design of Conjoint Choice Experiments , 2008, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[19]  Jie Yu,et al.  Efficient Conjoint Choice Designs in the Presence of Respondent Heterogeneity , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[20]  Kai-Tai Fang,et al.  An efficient method for constructing uniform designs with large size , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[21]  Qing Liu,et al.  Efficient Choice Designs for a Consider-Then-Choose Model , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[22]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[23]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Probabilistic Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis: Theory and Application , 2007 .

[24]  F. Pukelsheim Optimal Design of Experiments , 1993 .

[25]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement , 2008 .

[26]  Peter Goos,et al.  A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments , 2006 .

[27]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Heterogeneous Conjoint Choice Designs , 2005 .

[28]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis , 2005 .

[29]  Warren F. Kuhfeld,et al.  Large Factorial Designs for Product Engineering and Marketing Research Applications , 2005, Technometrics.

[30]  J. Kiefer General Equivalence Theory for Optimum Designs (Approximate Theory) , 1974 .

[31]  Stefanie Biedermann,et al.  On Optimal Designs for Nonlinear Models: A General and Efficient Algorithm , 2013 .