AUTOMATIC ORIENTATION OF IMAGE SEQUENCES IN CULTURAL HERITAGE

role in the field of cultural heritage. Making copies of virtual objects is very significant for their consultation, storage, disclosure and restoration. Nowadays the modeling of a free-form object can be attained both by laser-scanning and by digital photogrammetry. With the use of the last methodology dense point clouds can be obtained through elaborate process steps. The purpose of this study is to provide input to the automation of some phases of these processes. Recent advances in the Structure from Motion community have greatly extended the feature matching and triangulation capabilities to enable significantly larger datasets to be used for the reconstruction of the relative orientation of the cameras and, consequently, of the artefacts. In this paper a methodology to automatically orient a set of images is presented, such methodology makes use of algorithms for feature extraction coming from computer vision community and allows to easily recognize a large amount of homologous points on a set of images in a completely automatic way. The above said methodology has been adopted for the automatic orienting of some sequences of images relative to several interesting sites from the perspective of cultural heritage.

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Computational methods for automatic image registration , 2007 .

[3]  Li Zhang,et al.  SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR DETAILED CLOSE-RANGE OBJECT MODELING , 2006 .

[4]  Pascal Fua,et al.  On benchmarking camera calibration and multi-view stereo for high resolution imagery , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[6]  Louis Roy Miller Giersch Pathfinder Photogrammetry Research for Ultra-Lightweight and Inflatable Space Structures , 2001 .

[7]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[8]  C. Fraser,et al.  Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons , 2006 .

[9]  E. Mikhail,et al.  Introduction to modern photogrammetry , 2001 .

[10]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Acquisizione 3D e modellazione poligonale , 2010 .

[11]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry , 1999 .

[12]  Andrea Fusiello,et al.  Structure-and-motion pipeline on a hierarchical cluster tree , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops.

[13]  Duane C. Brown,et al.  Close-Range Camera Calibration , 1971 .

[14]  Matthew A. Brown,et al.  Automatic Panoramic Image Stitching using Invariant Features , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  AUTOMATION IN 3 D RECONSTRUCTION : RESULTS ON DIFFERENT KINDS OF CLOSE-RANGE BLOCKS , 2010 .

[16]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors with Automatic Algorithm Configuration , 2009, VISAPP.

[17]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..