Task and technology fit: a comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication

With the increasing use of emerging communication technologies for collaborative work and group communication, organizations must recognize the benefits as well as the limitations of these technologies for communication effectiveness. An experiment was conducted to examine the interaction between task structure and technology to support synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Two communication technologies, e-mail and a group support system (GSS), and two levels of task structure (less structured and more structured) were used. Group outcomes were measured as total number of unique ideas generated, which were further decomposed into basic and inferential idea categories. Results indicate that GSS-supported groups generated more total and basic ideas. However, groups using e-mail performed a deeper problem analysis as indicated by a higher proportion of inferential ideas generated by these groups. The number and proportion of inferential ideas were also significantly higher in the less structured task than those in the more structured one.

[1]  K. Wei,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Task Dimension of Group Support System , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[2]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Decision support for "messy" problems , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Communication Concurrency and the New Media , 1993 .

[4]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[5]  E. Ziegel.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics , 1994 .

[6]  T. S. Perry,et al.  Electronic mail-E-mail at work , 1992 .

[7]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[8]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  Information management , 1996 .

[9]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[10]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[13]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[14]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[15]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Interactional Influence in the Structuring of Media Use in Groups Influence in Members’Perceptions of Group Decision Support System Use , 1996 .

[16]  L HoffmanDonna,et al.  Internet and Web use in the U.S. , 1996 .

[17]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Organization and Technology , 1993 .

[19]  Daniel J. Power,et al.  Impacts of problem structure and computerized decision aids on decision attitudes and behaviors , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  Introduction to Marketing Research: Using the SAS System Version 6@@@A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics , 1996 .

[21]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  A comparative evaluation of the impact of electronic and voice mail on organizational communication , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[22]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[23]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Element Finding: The Impact of a Group Support System on a Crucial Phase of Sense Making , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..

[26]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[27]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[29]  S. Sitkin,et al.  A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations , 1992 .

[30]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[31]  Communication and Group Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1996 .

[32]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[33]  Mohan Tanniru,et al.  Conceptualizing Structurable Tasks in the Development of Knowledge‐Based Systems* , 1996 .

[34]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[35]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Electronic messaging and communication effectiveness in an ongoing work group , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[36]  J. Kevin Barge.  Leadership Skills and the Dialectics of Leadership in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[37]  William D. Kalsbeek,et al.  Internet and Web use in the U.S. , 1996, CACM.

[38]  Jerry Avorn.  Technology , 1929, Nature.

[39]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[40]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Poppy Lauretta Mcleod,et al.  New Communication Technologies for Group Decision Making: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1996 .

[42]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[43]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Computer-Assisted Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[44]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..