Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.

Making decisions informed by the best-available science is an objective for many organisations managing the environment or natural resources. Yet, available science is still not widely used in environmental policy and practice. We describe a '4S' hierarchy for organising relevant science to inform decisions. This hierarchy has already revolutionised clinical practice. It is beginning to emerge for environmental management, although all four levels need substantial development before environmental decision-makers can reliably and efficiently find the evidence they need. We expose common bypass routes that currently lead to poor or biased representation of scientific knowledge. We argue that the least developed level of the hierarchy is that closest to decision-makers, placing synthesised scientific knowledge into environmental decision support systems.

[1]  Martin Volk,et al.  How Can We Make Progress with Decision Support Systems in Landscape and River Basin Management? Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Four Different Decision Support Systems , 2010, Environmental management.

[2]  Tim Oxley,et al.  Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  R. W. Carter,et al.  Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions , 2010 .

[4]  Murray A. Rudd,et al.  Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy , 2011 .

[5]  Matt Keene,et al.  Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  A. Pullin,et al.  Doing more good than harm: building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. , 2009 .

[7]  I. Bainbridge,et al.  PRACTITIONER'S PERSPECTIVE: How can ecologists make conservation policy more evidence based? Ideas and examples from a devolved perspective , 2014 .

[8]  D. Rowe,et al.  Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[9]  Madeleine C. Bottrill,et al.  Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation , 2014 .

[10]  Peter W J Baxter,et al.  Using Conservation Evidence to Guide Management , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  B. Haynes.  Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the “5S” evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions , 2007, Evidence-based medicine.

[12]  A. Pullin,et al.  Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[13]  Andrew Peace,et al.  Participatory development of decision support systems: which features of the process lead to improved uptake and better outcomes? , 2014 .

[14]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[15]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  Organisational drivers for, constraints on and impacts of decision and information support tool use in desertification policy and management , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  C. A. Howell,et al.  How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions? , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  L. Hunter,et al.  Failure of Research to Address the Rangewide Conservation Needs of Large Carnivores: Leopards in South Africa as a Case Study , 2014 .

[18]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[19]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model , 2009, Evidence-based nursing.

[21]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Guiding the Participatory Development of Agricultural Decision Support Systems , 2010 .

[22]  Chris Sandbrook,et al.  Conservation, evidence and policy , 2013, Oryx.

[23]  T. de Wet,et al.  The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map , 2014 .

[24]  W. Sutherland,et al.  The need for evidence-based conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  M. Mrowiec,et al.  Modelling of green roofs' hydrologic performance using EPA's SWMM. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[27]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  Does Research Information Meet the Needs of Stakeholders? Exploring Evidence Selection in the Global Management of Invasive Species. , 2012 .

[28]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Expert Status and Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  Kingsbury,et al.  Habitat Management Guidelines for Amphibians and Reptiles , 2014 .

[30]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  EBMH notebook Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence , 2001 .

[31]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Improving the science–policy–practice interface: decision support system uptake and use in the forestry sector in Great Britain , 2014 .

[32]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .

[33]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Assessing Conservation Management's Evidence Base: a Survey of Management‐Plan Compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia , 2005 .

[34]  I. Hanski,et al.  Ineffective enforced legislation for nature conservation: A case study with Siberian flying squirrel and forestry in a boreal landscape , 2013 .

[35]  W. Sutherland.  Review by quality not quantity for better policy , 2013, Nature.

[36]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  On the Design of Computer-Based Models for Integrated Environmental Science , 2005, Environmental management.

[37]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine , 2006 .

[38]  Luiz Carlos Estraviz Rodriguez,et al.  Review. A brief overview of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS) listed in the FORSYS wiki , 2013 .

[39]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Evidence-based conservation and evidence-informed policy: a response to Adams & Sandbrook , 2013, Oryx.

[40]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[41]  L. Moja,et al.  Navigators for medicine: evolution of online point‐of‐care evidence‐based services , 2011, International journal of clinical practice.

[42]  Nicola Randall,et al.  The effectiveness of integrated farm management, organic farming and agri-environment schemes for conserving biodiversity in temperate Europe - A systematic map , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[43]  R. Aarde,et al.  Science and elephant management decisions in South Africa , 2011 .

[44]  R B Haynes,et al.  Of studies, syntheses, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence , 2001, Evidence-based mental health.

[45]  Jennifer L. Funk,et al.  Closing the Knowing–Doing Gap in Invasive Plant Management: Accessibility and Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Research , 2014 .

[46]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  A Transparent Process for “Evidence‐Informed” Policy Making , 2014 .

[47]  J. Meyer,et al.  Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners , 2007 .

[48]  A. Pullin,et al.  Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach , 2003 .

[49]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action Boundary , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[50]  B. Haynes.  Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. , 2006, Evidence-based nursing.

[51]  Louise M. Donnison,et al.  How effective are slurry storage, cover or catch crops, woodland creation, controlled trafficking or break-up of compacted layers, and buffer strips as on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment? , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[52]  H. Possingham,et al.  Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management Decisions , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[53]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  Alessandro Liberati,et al.  A Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[55]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? , 2004, Environmental Conservation.

[56]  Amelia Sharman,et al.  Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target† , 2010 .

[57]  M. Juntti,et al.  Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment , 2009 .

[58]  Marc Hockings,et al.  Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[59]  Rebecca K. Smith,et al.  Farmland Conservation: Evidence for the effects of interventions in northern and western Europe , 2014 .

[60]  D. Windish.  Searching for the right evidence: how to answer your clinical questions using the 6S hierarchy , 2012, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[61]  Pete Smith,et al.  A comparison of carbon accounting tools for arable crops in the United Kingdom , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[62]  Yanling Li,et al.  Green roof hydrologic performance and modeling: a review. , 2014, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.