Research on screening model of large high-tech enterprises product innovation idea

Based on the previous literature the importance of idea screening on large-scale high-tech enterprise is analyzed and then screening concept model is presented to process the conflict between idea innovation quality and screening time by employing BFPRT algorithm. Moreover, the microscopic process of screening and the screening model are to be explicitly expounded by adopting algorithm, providing valuable insights theoretically and practically. Consequently, the practical significance of this study is to effectively provide creative operable micro guide in ideas screening and to improve the success rate of product development. The beneficiaries are the large high-tech enterprise managers or NPD, R&D managers. The theoretical significance is to construct a new conceptual model of ideas screening algorithm based on the microstructure of the key issues in the screening model. Due to the limitations of the conditions, the proposed method has not actually been verified in the implementation process.

[1]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  2 WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT NEW PRODUCT IDEA SELECTION ? , 2002 .

[2]  B. Lukas,et al.  New product quality: intended and unintended consequences of new product development speed , 2004 .

[3]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms, Second Edition , 2001 .

[5]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[6]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[7]  Heinz-Jürgen Boeddrich.  Ideas in the Workplace: A New Approach Towards Organizing the Fuzzy Front End of the Innovation Process , 2004 .

[8]  P. Ranganath Nayak,et al.  Product Juggernauts: How Companies Mobilize to Generate a Stream of Market Winners , 1995 .

[9]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[11]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[12]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[13]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea , 2006 .

[14]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[15]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Toward Identifying the Inventive Templates of New Products: A Channeled Ideation Approach , 1999 .

[16]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success , 2000 .

[17]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  Reducing project related uncertainty in the "fuzzy front end" of innovation: a comparison of German and Japanese product innovation projects , 2004 .

[18]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey , 1997 .

[19]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs , 2001 .

[20]  Sam Bucolo,et al.  Design-led innovation - Exploring the synthesis of needs, technologies and business models , 2011 .

[21]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[22]  Markus Meier,et al.  Towards a Structured and Integrative Front-End of Product Innovation , 2004 .

[23]  Amar Bhidé,et al.  How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work , 1994 .

[24]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Time Bounds for Selection , 1973, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[25]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach , 2002 .

[26]  Jeffrey Davidson,et al.  Providing Clarity and A Common Language to the “Fuzzy Front End” , 2001 .

[27]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry , 2009 .

[28]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overhauling the new product process , 1996 .

[29]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  New product development processes and new product profitability: Exploring the mediating role of speed to market and product quality , 2011 .

[30]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[31]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Organizational Environment, New Product Process Activities, and Project Outcomes , 1991 .

[32]  Tony M. O'Driscoll,et al.  From experience: applying performance support technology in the fuzzy front end , 2000 .

[33]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[34]  Birgit Verworn,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of Japanese New Product Development Projects: Impact on Success and Differences between Incremental and Radical Projects , 2007 .

[35]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development , 1997 .

[36]  Olivier Toubia.  Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives , 2006 .

[37]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[38]  J. Hauser,et al.  The virtual customer , 2002 .

[39]  B. Skiera,et al.  Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets , 2012 .

[40]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  An Illustration of Potential Sources of Concept‐Test Error* , 2006 .

[41]  A. V. Sioukas,et al.  User involvement for effective customization: an empirical study on voice networks , 1995 .