Robustness of Protein Complex Networks

The stability and fragility of four species' (rat, yeast, mouse, human) protein complex networks (PCNs) are studied by investigating their robustness, i.e. whether their global topological properties, especially average diameter, retain a similar system behavior with respect to four different types of perturbations or not. Four types of perturbations consist of : (i) network edges are randomly removed, (ii) network nodes are randomly deleted (failure), (iii) the most connected nodes are successively removed (attack), and (iv) interaction edges are randomly rewired. In the experiment of this paper, at most 40% of network nodes or edges are deleted or rewired. It is demonstrated that, except mouse organism and attack perturbation, the average diameters for perturbed networks differ from the unperturbed cases in less than 13%, which is small in comparison with WWW and the Internet results. That is, the protein complex networks of rat, yeast and human species are quite robust with respect to failure, rewiring and edge deletion perturbations, but not robust against the attack one.

[1]  Jeffrey J. P. Tsai,et al.  Topological Robustness of the Protein-Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, Systems Biology and Regulatory Genomics.

[2]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[3]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Sergei Maslov,et al.  Protein interaction networks beyond artifacts , 2002, FEBS letters.

[5]  Colin Kleanthous,et al.  Protein-protein recognition , 2000 .

[6]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[7]  Ian M. Donaldson,et al.  The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Siu-Ming Yiu,et al.  Predicting Protein Complexes from PPI Data: A Core-Attachment Approach , 2009, J. Comput. Biol..

[9]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  An evolutionary and structural characterization of mammalian protein complex organization , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[10]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[11]  R. Russell,et al.  Potential artefacts in protein‐interaction networks , 2002, FEBS letters.

[12]  Ka-Lok Ng,et al.  Protein complexes subunits interaction topology and sequence identity , 2011, 2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development.

[13]  Hans-Werner Mewes,et al.  CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Frederic Pio,et al.  Predicting protein complexes by data integration of different types of interactions , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Biol. Drug Des..

[15]  Xiaoli Li,et al.  Computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks: a survey , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[16]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.