Living with interpersonal data: Observability and accountability in the age of pervasive ICT

The Internet of Things, alongside existing mobile digital technologies, heralds a world in which pervasive sensing constantly captures data about us. Simultaneous with this technology programme are moves by policymakers to shore up the digital economy through the legislating of new trust-building models of data management. These moves seek to give individuals control and oversight of their personal data. Within shared settings, the consequences of these changes are the large-scale generation of interpersonal data generated by and acting on the group rather than individual. We consider how such systems create new forms of observability and hence accountability among members of the home, and draw on the work of Simmel and Goffman to explore how these demands are managed. Such management mitigates the more extreme possibilities for domestic monitoring posited by these systems, yet without careful design there remains a considerable danger of unanticipated negative consequences.

[1]  Dear Mr Sotiropoulos ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party , 2013 .

[2]  Athena McLean,et al.  Ethical frontiers of ICT and older users: cultural, pragmatic and ethical issues , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[3]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful design: showing the seams in wearable computing , 2003 .

[4]  E. Goffman Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[5]  Charlie Gere,et al.  Digital Culture , 2004 .

[6]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW seriously , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Enabling the new economic actor: data protection, the digital economy, and the Databox , 2016, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[8]  Liisa Annukka Mäkinen,et al.  Surveillance ON/OFF. Examining home surveillance systems from the user's perspective. , 2016 .

[9]  Dave W. Randall,et al.  Ethnography, ethnomethodology and the problem of generalisation in design , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Ralph H. Turner RELATIONS IN PUBLIC: MICROSTUDIES OF THE PUBLIC ORDER. By Erving Goffman. New York: Basic Books, 1971. 396 pp. $7.95 , 1973 .

[11]  E. Shove Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality , 2003 .

[12]  Peter Tolmie,et al.  "How Many Bloody Examples Do You Want?" Fieldwork and Generalisation , 2013, ECSCW.

[13]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[14]  Jack Whalen,et al.  Sociology as a Natural Observational Science@@@Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. , 1987 .

[15]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[16]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[17]  Tom Rodden,et al.  “This has to be the cats”: Personal Data Legibility in Networked Sensing Systems , 2016, CSCW.

[18]  Bridgette Wessels,et al.  Identification and the practices of identity and privacy in everyday digital communication , 2012, New Media Soc..

[19]  Helen J. Richardson,et al.  A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs , 2009, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[20]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Sociology of Secrecy and of Secret Societies , 1906, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[22]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[23]  Daniel Neyland,et al.  Achieving Transparency: The Visible, Invisible and Divisible in Academic Accountability Networks , 2007 .

[24]  Bernard J. Frieden,et al.  Notes on Methodology , 2020, Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies.