Swelling-Induced Volumetric Strains Internal to a Stressed Coal Associated with CO2 Sorption

Abstract It is generally accepted that typical coalbed gases (methane and carbon dioxide) are sorbed (both adsorbed and absorbed) in the coal matrix causing it to swell and resulting in local stress and strain variations in a coalbed confined under overburden pressure. The swelling, interactions of gases within the coal matrix and the resultant changes in the permeability, sorption, gas flow mechanics in the reservoir, and stress state of the coal can impact a number of reservoir-related factors. These include effective production of coalbed methane, degasification of future mining areas by drilling horizontal and vertical degasification wells, injection of CO2 as an enhanced coalbed methane recovery technique, and concurrent CO2 sequestration. Such information can also provide an understanding of the mechanisms behind gas outbursts in underground coal mines. The spatio-temporal volumetric strains in a consolidated Pittsburgh seam coal sample were evaluated while both confining pressure and carbon dioxide (CO2) pore pressure were increased to keep a constant positive effective stress on the sample. The changes internal to the sample were evaluated by maps of density and atomic number determined by dual-energy X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT). Early-time images, as soon as CO2 was introduced, were also used to calculate the macroporosity in the coal sample. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and photographic images of the polished section of the coal sample at X-ray CT image location were used to identify the microlithotypes and microstructures. The CO2 sorption-associated swelling and volumetric strains in consolidated coal under constant effective stress are heterogeneous processes depending on the lithotypes present. In the time scale of the experiment, vitrite showed the highest degree of swelling due to dissolution of CO2, while the clay (kaolinite) and inertite region was compressed in response. The volumetric strains associated with swelling and compression were between ± 15% depending on the location. Although the effective stress on the sample was constant, it varied within the sample as a result of the internal stresses created by gas sorption-related structural changes. SEM images and porosity calculations revealed that the kaolinite and inertite bearing layer was highly porous, which enabled the fastest CO2 uptake and the highest degree of compression.

[1]  Jan Larsen,et al.  Structural rearrangement of strained coals , 1997 .

[2]  G. Ceglarska-Stefańska,et al.  Correlation between sorption and dilatometric processes in hard coals , 1993 .

[3]  Guoliang Chen,et al.  Estimation of changes in fracture porosity of coal with gas emission , 1995 .

[4]  P. J. Reucroft,et al.  Effect of pressure on carbon dioxide induced coal swelling , 1987 .

[5]  R. Gayer,et al.  Coalbed Methane And Coal Geology , 1996 .

[6]  John W. Larsen,et al.  The effects of dissolved CO2 on coal structure and properties , 2004 .

[7]  K. Schroeder,et al.  Volumetric Effects in Coal Sorption Capacity Measurements , 2006 .

[8]  C. Karacan,et al.  Behavior and effect of different coal microlithotypes during gas transport for carbon dioxide sequestration into coal seams , 2003 .

[9]  Richard L. Christiansen,et al.  Measurement of Sorption-Induced Strain , 2005 .

[10]  A. Saghafi,et al.  OVERVIEW OF GAS OUTBURSTS AND UNUSUAL EMISSIONS , 2002 .

[11]  Basil Beamish,et al.  Instantaneous outbursts in underground coal mines: An overview and association with coal type , 1998 .

[12]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[13]  Vyacheslav Romanov,et al.  Errors in CO2 Adsorption Measurements Caused by Coal Swelling , 2006 .

[14]  M. Paulaitis,et al.  Swelling and sorption in polymer-CO2 mixtures at elevated pressures , 1987 .

[15]  G. Cody,et al.  Anisotropic solvent swelling of coals , 1988 .

[16]  Yujiro Ogawa,et al.  Mechanism of methane flow through sheared coals and its role on methane recovery , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffrey R. Levine,et al.  Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs , 1996, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[18]  Jerzy Ziętek,et al.  Changes of acoustic emission and strain in hard coal during gas sorption–desorption cycles , 2007 .

[19]  John W. Larsen,et al.  Structure Changes in Pittsburgh No. 8 Coal Caused by Sorption of CO2 Gas , 2005 .

[20]  Hong Gao,et al.  Statistical Distribution Characteristics of Pyridine Transport in Coal Particles and a Series of New Phenomenological Models for Overshoot and Nonovershoot Solvent Swelling of Coal Particles , 1999 .

[21]  Badie I. Morsi,et al.  Importance of Volume Effects to Adsorption Isotherms of Carbon Dioxide on Coals , 2003 .

[22]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Heterogeneous Sorption and Swelling in a Confined and Stressed Coal during CO2 Injection , 2003 .

[23]  H. Schaetzler Basic aspects on the use of elastic and inelastic scattered gamma radiation for the determination of binary systems with effective atomic numbers of less than 10 , 1979 .

[24]  Robert C. Burruss,et al.  Geochemical Investigation of the Potential for Mobilizing Non-Methane Hydrocarbons during Carbon Dioxide Storage in Deep Coal Beds , 2006 .

[25]  U. Bianchi Pressure Effects on Glass Transition in Polymers , 1965 .

[26]  Gilles Peix,et al.  Effective atomic number in the Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio , 1999 .

[27]  L. Connell,et al.  A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling , 2007 .

[28]  W. Sachse,et al.  Effects of high‐pressure CO2 on the glass transition temperature and mechanical properties of polystyrene , 1982 .