Opensource platforms under coopetition: a comparative analysis of sourceforge and 'CodeX' (Xerox) as two 'coopetitive learning and knowledge exchange networks' (coLKENs)

This paper investigates 'Co-opetitive Learning and Knowledge Exchange Networks' (CoLKENs) deploying open source platforms. The balancing act between cooperation and competition which CoLKENs must execute when engaging in collaboration with eventual competitors is heightened within an open source environment. This requires the designing and implementing of specific management processes to enable economic value maximization for participating individuals and firms. The authors first describe the concept of CoLKENs, their components and their generic structure. Relevant dimensions to examine when investigating CoLKENs are then identified. Specific characteristics of open source CoLKENs are reviewed and two cases, SourceForge and CodeX (Xerox) are analyzed. Findings indicate varying motivations for participation, diverse methods of leadership and governance, several specifically tailored tools for managing collaboration and primarily hidden coordination and control mechanisms for dealing with competition. Finally, the authors identify the need for future research, especially in the area of evaluating and managing the element of competition. * My thanks go to my hosts at INSEAD's Technology Management Department (Sept. – Dec. 2002) as well as to the EU funded 'eFactors' project (IST-2001-34868). ** My thanks go to the dedicated researchers involved in the EU funded 'Knowlaboration' project, and in particular to Katerina Nicolopoulou and Michael Gibbert, Karen Askov and Lynn Selhat. Loebbecke,Angehrn Open Source Platforms under Co-opetition

[1]  Philip Powell,et al.  Co-opetition and knowledge transfer , 1999, DATB.

[2]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[3]  C. Loebbecke,et al.  Virtual Organizations That Cooperate and Compete: Managing the Risks of Knowledge Exchange , 2002 .

[4]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[5]  Kasper Edwards.  When Beggars Become Choosers , 2000, First Monday.

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[7]  J. Sutton,et al.  Competing in Capabilities , 2004 .

[8]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[9]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation”. Organisation Science. , 1994 .

[10]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Science, Publicity, and Consciousness , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[11]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[12]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[15]  Kasper Edwards.  When beggers become choosers , 2000 .

[16]  C. Loebbecke.  Investigating Coopetitive Learning and Knowledge Exchange Networks (colkens) as Emerging Concept in Management Literature and Practice 2. Cooperative Learning and Knowledge Exchange Networks (colkens) and Their Fundamental Components , 2003 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[18]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[19]  D. Teece.  Research Directions for Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[20]  Jacob G. Birnberg,et al.  Control in Interfirm Co‐operative Relationships , 1998 .

[21]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[22]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[23]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[24]  P. Drucker.  The Effective Executive , 2016 .

[25]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[27]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[28]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[29]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Shaping organization form : communication, connection, and community , 1999 .

[30]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[31]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[32]  E. Hippel.  Innovation by User Communities: Learning From Open-Source Software , 2001 .

[33]  von Hippel,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4366-02 June 2002 Open source projects as horizontal innovation networks-by and for users , 2003 .

[34]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[35]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[36]  Benoît Demil,et al.  Open standard : role of externalities and impact on the industry structure , 2002 .

[37]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[38]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in a Transition Economy: Learning-by-Doing and Learning Myopia , 2002 .

[39]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .