Method of identifying dynamic multileaf collimator irradiation that is highly sensitive to a systematic MLC calibration error.

In intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), radiation is delivered in a multiple of multileaf collimator (MLC) subfields. A subfield with a small leaf-to-leaf opening is highly sensitive to a leaf-positional error. We introduce a method of identifying and rejecting IMRT plans that are highly sensitive to a systematic MLC gap error (sensitivity to possible random leaf-positional errors is not addressed here). There are two sources of a systematic MLC gap error: centerline mechanical offset (CMO) and, in the case of a rounded end MLC, radiation field offset (RFO). In IMRT planning system, using an incorrect value of RFO introduces a systematic error ARFO that results in all leaf-to-leaf gaps that are either too large or too small by (2*DeltaRFO), whereas assuming that CMO is zero introduces systematic error DeltaCMO that results in all gaps that are too large by DeltaCMO=CMO. We introduce a concept of the average leaf pair Opening (ALPO) that can be calculated from a dynamic MLC delivery file. We derive an analytic formula for a fractional average fluence error resulting from a systematic gap error of Deltax and show that it is inversely proportional to ALPO; explicitly it is equal to Deltax/(ALPO+ 2 * RFO+ epsilon), in which epsilon is generally of the order of 1 mm and Deltax =2 * Delta RFO + CMO. This analytic relationship is verified with independent numerical calculations.

[1]  G T Chen,et al.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery error from radiation field offset inaccuracy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  R Mohan,et al.  A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  D. Convery,et al.  The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation , 1992 .

[5]  W Schlegel,et al.  Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  C. Ling,et al.  Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[7]  A L Boyer,et al.  Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends. , 1997, Medical physics.

[8]  C D Mubata,et al.  A quality assurance procedure for the Varian multi-leaf collimator. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A Brahme,et al.  Shaping of arbitrary dose distributions by dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  G T Chen,et al.  A monitor unit verification calculation in intensity modulated radiotherapy as a dosimetry quality assurance. , 2000, Medical physics.

[11]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[12]  T LoSasso,et al.  Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  A L Boyer,et al.  An optimized leaf-setting algorithm for beam intensity modulation using dynamic multileaf collimators , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  D A Low,et al.  Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.