Pedestrian Count Expansion Methods: Bridging the Gap between Land Use Groups and Empirical Clusters

Count expansion methods are a useful tool for creating long-term pedestrian or cyclist volume estimates from short-term counts for safety analysis or planning purposes. Expansion factors can be developed based on the trends from automated counters set up for long periods of time. Evidence has shown that the activity patterns can vary between sites so that there is potential to create more accurate estimates by grouping similar long-term count trends into factor groups. There are two common approaches to developing factor groups in pedestrian and cyclist count expansion studies. The land use classification approach has the advantage of being simple to apply to short-term count locations based on attributes of the surrounding area, but it requires assumptions by the researchers about which characteristics correlate with different activity patterns. Empirical clustering approaches can potentially create more distinct clusters by effectively matching locations with similar patterns, but they do not present an easy way to apply the resulting factor groups to appropriate short-term count sites. This study connects the two approaches and takes advantage of the benefits of both by using objective measures of the surrounding land use to model membership in the empirical cluster groups.

[1]  Suming Jin,et al.  Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information , 2015 .

[2]  Christophe Genolini,et al.  KmL: k-means for longitudinal data , 2010, Comput. Stat..

[3]  Julia B. Griswold,et al.  Comparison of Pedestrian Count Expansion Methods: Land Use Groups versus Empirical Clusters , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[4]  Xiaolu Zhou,et al.  Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing , 2013 .

[5]  Krista Nordback,et al.  Methods for Estimating Bicycling and Walking in Washington State , 2014 .

[7]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Classification of Bicycle Traffic Patterns in Five North American Cities , 2013 .

[8]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Development and Application of Volume Model for Pedestrian Intersections in San Francisco, California , 2012 .

[9]  A S Hakkert,et al.  ESTIMATING THE DAILY VOLUME OF CROSSING PEDESTRIANS FROM SHORT-COUNTS , 1988 .

[10]  R. Kyle Bocinsky Functions to Automate Downloading Geospatial Data Available fromSeveral Federated Data Sources , 2016 .

[11]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Day-of-Year Scaling Factors and Design Considerations for Nonmotorized Traffic Monitoring Programs , 2014 .

[12]  Christophe Ley,et al.  Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median , 2013 .

[13]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Development and Application of the San Francisco Pedestrian Intersection Volume Model , 2013 .

[14]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections , 2009 .

[15]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection , 2014 .

[16]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Real-time trip purpose prediction using online location-based search and discovery services , 2017 .

[17]  Qunying Huang,et al.  From where do tweets originate?: a GIS approach for user location inference , 2014, LBSN '14.