Gender-specific pathways to intimacy in early adolescence

As part of a larger longitudinal study of psychosocial development, 148 girls and 130 boys were administered a series of questions regarding a close friend during their eighth-grade school year. Scales corresponding to shared experience, self-disclosure, and intimacy (defined as emotional closeness) were developed from these items. Path-analytic models tested the relative strength of the self-disclosure and shared experience paths to emotional closeness for boys and girls separately. The results indicated that the self-disclosure path to emotional closeness is significant for both boys and girls. No relationship was found between shared experience and emotional closeness in girls when controlling for self-disclosure. The relationship between shared experience and feelings of closeness was, however, significant for boys even while controlling for the effects of self-disclosure. Covariance structure analysis (LISREL) indicated that the covariance matrices for the three scales were significantly different for boys and girls. The results are considered in relation to the gender socialization and friendship literature. The potential importance of defining intimacy as emotional closeness is also discussed.

[1]  J. Lever,et al.  Sex Differences in the Games Children Play , 1976 .

[2]  T. J. Berndt,et al.  The Features and Effects of Friendship in Early Adolescence. , 1982 .

[3]  A. Petersen,et al.  Relation of weight to body image in pubertal girls and boys from two communities. , 1990 .

[4]  Elizabeth Ann Malcolm Douvan,et al.  The adolescent experience , 1966 .

[5]  F. Hunter,et al.  Changes in functions of three relations during adolescence. , 1982 .

[6]  M. Fasteau.  The Male Machine. , 1974 .

[7]  H. S. Sullivan.  The interpersonal theory of psychiatry , 1953 .

[8]  R. Diaz,et al.  Children's knowledge of a best friend: Fact or fancy? , 1982 .

[9]  J. Hoelter.  The Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1983 .

[10]  J. Hofman,et al.  Girlfriend, boyfriend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship. , 1981 .

[11]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[12]  P. Baltes.  Longitudinal and cross-sectional sequences in the study of age and generation effects. , 1968, Human development.

[13]  T. Huston,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and relationships. , 1978, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Thomas J. Bemdt,et al.  The Features and Effects of Friendship in Early Adolescence , 2005 .

[15]  John P. Hill,et al.  Early adolescents' significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and nonfamilial adults and young people , 1982, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[16]  A. Petersen.  The Early Adolescence Study: An Overview , 1984 .

[17]  Sex Differences In Intimacy Motivation , 1980 .

[18]  H. W. Richey,et al.  The significance of best‐friend relationships in adolescence , 1980 .

[19]  J. Fischer,et al.  Sex Roles and Intimacy in Same Sex and Other Sex Relationships , 1981 .

[20]  R. Brain.  Friends and lovers , 1976 .

[21]  K. Schaie.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF DEVELOPMENTAL PROBLEMS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  A. Petersen,et al.  Perceptions of the Peer Group and Friendship in Early Adolescence , 1984 .