Using and Abusing QFD Scores

In this article the authors address implementation and use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in organizations today. With both single and multiple houses of quality, there are questions of meaningfulness and validity of the final quantitative output. Unfortunately, the validity of the quantitative output can impact the validity of the qualitative insights into the organization's decision-making process. The meaningfulness of the quantitative output depends, to a large part, on the care and consistency with which the houses of quality were built and scored. The authors offer some advice on scoring houses of quality, based on their findings. The mathematical structure of the QFD calculations, however, dictates certain constraints on the use of its output. These constraints can impact the usefulness of a single house's output and can seriously reduce the value of multiple-house QFD studies. *The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, the U.S. Government, or the opinions of Bristol–Myers Squibb Company.

[1]  Fred S. Roberts,et al.  Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences: Three Representation Problems: Ordinal, Extensive, and Difference Measurement , 1984 .

[2]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[3]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[4]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[5]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[6]  R. Clemen,et al.  Soft Computing , 2002 .

[7]  Martin Kenneth Starr,et al.  The structure of human decisions , 1967 .

[8]  Jonathan Barzilai On the decomposition of value functions , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[9]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[10]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[11]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[12]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[13]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  Eric R. Zieyel Operations research : applications and algorithms , 1988 .

[15]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  A Tutorial on Quality Function Deployment , 1993 .

[16]  F. Roberts Measurement Theory with Applications to Decisionmaking, Utility, and the Social Sciences: Measurement Theory , 1984 .

[17]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Foundational aspects of theories of measurement , 1958, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[18]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[19]  Gregory S. Parnell,et al.  Quality function deployment and decision analysis :A R&D case study , 2000 .

[20]  Ronald G. Day Quality Function Deployment: Linking a Company With Its Customers , 1993 .

[21]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .