Relationship between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal: analysis of field data.

The magnitude of contaminant mass-flux reduction associated with a specific amount of contaminant mass removed is a key consideration for evaluating the effectiveness of a source-zone remediation effort. Thus, there is great interest in characterizing, estimating, and predicting relationships between mass-flux reduction and mass removal. Published data collected for several field studies were examined to evaluate relationships between mass-flux reduction and source-zone mass removal. The studies analyzed herein represent a variety of source-zone architectures, immiscible-liquid compositions, and implemented remediation technologies. There are two general approaches to characterizing the mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship, end-point analysis and time-continuous analysis. End-point analysis, based on comparing masses and mass fluxes measured before and after a source-zone remediation effort, was conducted for 21 remediation projects. Mass removals were greater than 60% for all but three of the studies. Mass-flux reductions ranging from slightly less than to slightly greater than one-to-one were observed for the majority of the sites. However, these single-snapshot characterizations are limited in that the antecedent behavior is indeterminate. Time-continuous analysis, based on continuous monitoring of mass removal and mass flux, was performed for two sites, both for which data were obtained under water-flushing conditions. The reductions in mass flux were significantly different for the two sites (90% vs. approximately 8%) for similar mass removals ( approximately 40%). These results illustrate the dependence of the mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship on source-zone architecture and associated mass-transfer processes. Minimal mass-flux reduction was observed for a system wherein mass removal was relatively efficient (ideal mass-transfer and displacement). Conversely, a significant degree of mass-flux reduction was observed for a site wherein mass removal was inefficient (non-ideal mass-transfer and displacement). The mass-flux-reduction/mass-removal relationship for the latter site exhibited a multi-step behavior, which cannot be predicted using some of the available simple estimation functions.

[1]  P. Forsyth,et al.  Influence of alternative dissolution models and subsurface heterogeneity on DNAPL disappearance times , 1998 .

[2]  C. H. Ward,et al.  Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  John F. McBride,et al.  Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media: Model Experiments , 1990 .

[4]  S. Berglund.  Aquifer remediation by pumping: A model for stochastic‐advective transport with nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution , 1997 .

[5]  J. Fried,et al.  Ground‐Water Pollution by Transfer of Oil Hydrocarbons , 1979 .

[6]  J. Sykes,et al.  The influence of NAPL dissolution characteristics on field-scale contaminant transport in subsurface , 2000 .

[7]  M. Rivett,et al.  Transport of a dissolved-phase plume from a residual solvent source in a sand aquifer , 1994 .

[8]  G. Tick,et al.  Dissolution of nonuniformly distributed immiscible liquid: intermediate-scale experiments and mathematical modeling. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  J. W. Mercer,et al.  Contaminant transport in groundwater. , 1992 .

[10]  T. Phelan,et al.  Influence of textural and wettability variations on predictions of DNAPL persistence and plume development in saturated porous media , 2004 .

[11]  S. Powers,et al.  Non–aqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous systems: Mechanisms and a local equilibrium modeling approach , 1998 .

[12]  G. Pope,et al.  Performance assessment of NAPL remediation in heterogeneous alluvium. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[13]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Source-zone characterization of a chlorinated-solvent contaminated Superfund site in Tucson, AZ. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[14]  Robert C Knox,et al.  Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced solubilization of DNAPL at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[15]  R. Falta,et al.  Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution. , 2005, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[16]  A. L. Wood,et al.  Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[17]  M. Rivett,et al.  Dissolution of an emplaced source of DNAPL in a natural aquifer setting. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  T H Illangasekare,et al.  A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  C. H. Ward,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Remediating Chlorinated Solvent Source Zones , 2003 .

[20]  J. Cherry,et al.  Solvent Release into a Sandy Aquifer. 1. Overview of Source Distribution and Dissolution Behavior , 1999 .

[21]  Mark L. Brusseau,et al.  Nonideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 5. Simulating regional‐scale behavior of a trichloroethene plume during pump‐and‐treat remediation , 1999 .

[22]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[23]  J. Quinn,et al.  Field demonstration of DNAPL dehalogenation using emulsified zero-valent iron. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  L. Abriola,et al.  Modeling dense nonaqueous phase liquid mass removal in nonuniform formations: Linking source-zone architecture and system response , 2006 .

[25]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Partitioning Tracer Tests for Characterizing Immiscible‐Fluid Saturations and Interfacial Areas in the Vadose Zone , 2003 .

[26]  J. Lang,et al.  Influence of hydraulic property correlation on predicted dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone architecture, mass recovery and contaminant flux , 2004 .

[27]  J. Pichtel.  Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds , 2001 .

[28]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Partitioning Tracer Tests for Evaluating Remediation Performance , 2000 .

[29]  T. Sale,et al.  Comment on: Steady state mass transfer from single-component dense nonaqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields. Authors' reply , 2003 .

[30]  A. L. Wood,et al.  Field‐scale evaluation of in situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation , 1997 .

[31]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Groundwater contaminant flux reduction resulting from nonaqueous phase liquid mass reduction , 2005 .

[32]  Thomas F. Russell.  Computational methods in water resources IX , 1992 .

[33]  S. Powers,et al.  NAPL dissolution in heterogeneous systems: an experimental investigation in a simple heterogeneous system , 2000 .

[34]  Abraham S. C. Chen,et al.  Chemical oxidation and reactive barriers : remediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds , 2000 .

[35]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A Framework for Assessing Risk Reduction Due to DNAPL Mass Removal from Low‐Permeability Soils , 1997 .

[36]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  DNAPL Removal from a Heterogeneous Alluvial Aquifer by Surfactant‐ Enhanced Aquifer Remediation , 2001 .

[37]  J. Jawitz,et al.  DNAPL source depletion: linking architecture and flux response. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[38]  T. Sale,et al.  Steady state mass transfer from single‐component dense nonaqueous phase liquids in uniform flow fields , 2001 .

[39]  Ronald W Falta,et al.  Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response. , 2005, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[40]  M. C. Brooks,et al.  Interpreting tracer data to forecast remedial performance , 2002 .

[41]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Influence of Heterogeneity and Sampling Method on Aqueous Concentrations Associated with NAPL Dissolution , 2000 .

[42]  Mark L. Brusseau,et al.  Field Study of the Partitioning Tracer Method for Detection of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid in a Trichloroethene- Contaminated Aquifer , 1996 .

[43]  M. C. Brooks,et al.  Controlled release, blind tests of DNAPL characterization using partitioning tracers. , 2002, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[44]  P. F. Hudak,et al.  Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup , 1995 .

[45]  Mark L. Brusseau,et al.  Rate‐limited mass transfer and transport of organic solutes in porous media that contain immobile immiscible organic liquid , 1992 .

[46]  Craig Taylor,et al.  A Controlled Field Test of Surfactant‐Enhanced Aquifer Remediation , 1996 .

[47]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Cyclodextrin-Enhanced in Situ Flushing of Multiple-Component Immiscible Organic Liquid Contamination at the Field Scale: Mass Removal Effectiveness , 1998 .

[48]  Mario Schirmer,et al.  Dissolution and mass transfer of multiple organics under field conditions: The Borden emplaced source , 1999 .

[49]  James F. Pankow,et al.  Dissolution of dense chlorinated solvents into groundwater. 3. Modeling contaminant plumes from fingers and pools of solvent , 1992 .

[50]  E. Suchomel,et al.  Reductions in contaminant mass discharge following partial mass removal from DNAPL source zones. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  The influence of mass transfer characteristics and porous media heterogeneity on nonaqueous phase dissolution , 1996 .

[52]  B. Looney,et al.  Final report for demonstration of in situ oxidation of DNAPL using the Geo-Cleanse technology , 1997 .

[53]  Eungyu Park,et al.  Modeling field‐scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers , 2004 .

[54]  P. Rao,et al.  NAPL source zone characterization and remediation technology performance assessment: recent developments and applications of tracer techniques , 2000 .

[55]  N. Guiguer.  Numerical Modelling of the Fate of Residual Immiscible Fluids in Saturated Porous Media , 1991 .

[56]  A. L. Wood,et al.  Technology integration for contaminated site remediation: clean-up goals and performance criteria. , 2002 .

[57]  Michael C Kavanaugh,et al.  The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is There a Case for Source Depletion? , 2003 .

[58]  M. Rivett,et al.  A controlled field experiment on groundwater contamination by a multicomponent DNAPL: creation of the emplaced-source and overview of dissolved plume development. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[59]  J. Jawitz,et al.  In-situ alcohol flushing of a DNAPL source zone at a dry cleaner site. , 2000 .

[60]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[61]  D. McKinney,et al.  Demonstration of surfactant flooding of an alluvial aquifer contaminated with dense nonaqueous phase liquid , 1999 .