Does AI Raise Any Distinctive Ethical Questions

In developing codes of ethics for AI, it’s important to consider how the ethical issues concerning AI relate to other ethical issues. Some of the questions overlap with those relevant to other rapidly developing technologies, especially where those technologies involve questions about how we humans understand ourselves and our place in the world. Issues that concern both AI and other areas of science and technology include the difficulty of considering ethical issues where predictions about the future may be difficult to make; where technology is embedded in complex ways in society, the economy and culture; where the analysis and use of large amounts of data are at issue; and where complex, large systems give rise to difficult questions about the distribution and attribution of responsibility. Characteristic ethical questions regarding AI concern its typical enhancement or replacement of human agency; crucially, questions of agency are at the heart of how we understand ethics. AI, like other technologies, is often hyped up; it’s important to see through the hype to as realistic a picture as possible. Hype can distort our ethical thinking in dangerous ways, and some of the key hazards of hype regarding ethics are outlined.

[1]  R. Crawford Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life , 1980, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Social Sciences and Modern States: Frame-reflective policy discourse , 1991 .

[3]  IT'S (NOT) EASY BEING GREEN: Unpacking visual rhetoric and environmental claims in car, energy and utility advertisements in the UK (2007-08) 1 . , 2009 .

[4]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation , 2009 .

[5]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What's Right and What to Do about It , 2011 .

[6]  S. Derbyshire,et al.  The Tyranny of Health: Doctors and the Regulation of Lifestyle , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  James A. Throgmorton,et al.  Planning as a Rhetorical Activity: Survey Research as a Trope in Arguments About Electric Power Planning in Chicago , 1993 .

[8]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , 1989 .

[9]  Vincent C. Müller Introduction: Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence , 2012, Minds and Machines.

[10]  C. Condit,et al.  Science and the Sources of Hype , 2012, Public Health Genomics.

[11]  N. Agar Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement , 2004 .

[12]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain , 2002, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning.

[13]  P. Boddington Data Sharing in Genomics , 2012 .

[14]  Kenneth M. Ford,et al.  Cognitive Orthoses: Toward Human-Centered AI , 2015, AI Mag..

[15]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Stephen Hawking: \'Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence - but are we taking AI seriously enough?\' , 2014 .

[16]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Human Evolutionary Psychology , 2001 .

[17]  T. Piketty Capital in the twenty-first century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes. , 2013, The British journal of sociology.

[18]  Joy Bill,et al.  Why the future doesn’t need us , 2003 .

[19]  Ryan Calo,et al.  There is a blind spot in AI research , 2016, Nature.

[20]  A. Lippman,et al.  Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities , 2020, American Journal of Law & Medicine.