Fate of antibiotics in activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration (CAS-UF) and in a membrane bioreactor (MBR).

The fates of several macrolide, sulphonamide, and trimethoprim antibiotics contained in the raw sewage of the Tel-Aviv wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) were investigated after the sewage was treated using either a full-scale conventional activated sludge (CAS) system coupled with a subsequent ultrafiltration (UF) step or a pilot membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. Antibiotics removal in the MBR system, once it achieved stable operation, was 15-42% higher than that of the CAS system. This advantage was reduced to a maximum of 20% when a UF was added to the CAS. It was hypothesized that the contribution of membrane separation (in both systems) to antibiotics removal was due either to sorption to biomass (rather than improvement in biodegradation) or to enmeshment in the membrane biofilm (since UF membrane pores are significantly larger than the contaminant molecules). Batch experiments with MBR biomass showed a markedly high potential for sorption of the tested antibiotics onto the biomass. Moreover, methanol extraction of MBR biomass released significant amounts of sorbed antibiotics. This finding implies that more attention must be devoted to the management of excess sludge.

[1]  Herman Goossens,et al.  European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. , 2011, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[2]  T. Ternes Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers 1 Dedicated to Professor Dr. Klaus , 1998 .

[3]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Critical risk points of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes in water recycling applications , 2006 .

[4]  E. Thurman,et al.  Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. , 2002 .

[5]  M. Jekel,et al.  COMPARISON OF TWO TREATMENTS FOR THE REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MICRO-POLLUTANTS: CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (CAS) FOLLOWED BY ULTRAFILTRATION (UF) VS. MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) , 2011 .

[6]  N Kreuzinger,et al.  Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  H Kroiss,et al.  Relevance of the sludge retention time (SRT) as design criteria for wastewater treatment plants for the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals from wastewater. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  D. D. Mishra,et al.  Studies on the correlation between structure and adsorption of sulfonamide compounds , 2000 .

[9]  T. Heberer,et al.  From municipal sewage to drinking water: fate and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment in urban areas. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Terri Damstra,et al.  International Programme on Chemical Safety Global Assessment: The State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors , 2002 .

[11]  T Wintgens,et al.  Removal of hormones and pharmaceuticals in the Advanced Water Recycling Demonstration Plant in Queensland, Australia. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  N. Paxéus Removal of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), gemfibrozil, carbamazepine, beta-blockers, trimethoprim and triclosan in conventional wastewater treatment plants in five EU countries and their discharge to the aquatic environment. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Robert C. Andrews,et al.  Membrane adsorption of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceutically active compounds , 2007 .

[14]  Mira Petrovic,et al.  Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[15]  R M Stuetz,et al.  Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes. , 2010, Water research.

[16]  T. Ternes,et al.  Assessment of the importance of sorption for steroid estrogens removal during activated sludge treatment. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[17]  T. Ternes,et al.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change? , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  Christian Zwiener,et al.  Oxidative treatment of pharmaceuticals in water , 2000 .

[19]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Måns Ehrenberg,et al.  The mechanism of action of macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin B reveals the nascent peptide exit path in the ribosome. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.