Incisional complications following exploratory celiotomy: does an abdominal bandage reduce the risk?

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY Post operative complications following exploratory laparotomy can be potentially life-threatening, increase post operative morbidity and result in an increase in the length of hospitalisation of the affected individual. No study has evaluated the efficacy of specific strategies to reduce the incidence of post operative incisional complications. HYPOTHESIS The use of an abdominal bandage following colic surgery through a celiotomy incision would significantly reduce the prevalence of post operative incisional complications. METHODS A controlled, randomised clinical trial to test the hypothesis was devised. Horses eligible for inclusion in the study were assigned randomly either to the study or control group following recovery from general anaesthesia. Any post operative incisional complications occurring during hospitalisation were recorded. Long-term follow-up was obtained via telephone questionnaires. Absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. Multivariable analyses were conducted for all outcomes of interest. RESULTS There was an ARR of the likelihood of developing a post operative incisional complication of 45% when using compared to not using an abdominal bandage in the post operative period. Therefore, it would be necessary to treat 2.2 horses with an abdominal bandage in order to prevent one horse developing any post operative incisional complications. CONCLUSIONS Although incisional complications continue to be a problem following an exploratory celiotomy for colic, the proportion of horses affected was significantly reduced by use of a bandage. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE Using an abdominal bandage following an exploratory laparotomy may help reduce the prevalence of post operative incisional complications, and prevent the development of potentially life-threatening complications.

[1]  T. Mair,et al.  Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: Short-term complications. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[2]  T. Mair,et al.  Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 1: Short-term survival following a single laparotomy. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[3]  J. Smith,et al.  Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[4]  J. Foreman,et al.  Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in the horse. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[5]  G. Baxter,et al.  Bacterial culturing of ventral median celiotomies for prediction of postoperative incisional complications in horses. , 1997, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[6]  N. Cohen,et al.  Risk factors for wound infection following celiotomy in horses. , 1997, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[7]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Comparative evaluation of two surgical scrub preparations in cattle. , 1996, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[8]  D. Wilson,et al.  Complications of celiotomy incisions in horses. , 1995, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[9]  T. Phillips,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the results of 151 exploratory laparotomies in horses with gastrointestinal disease. , 1993, Equine veterinary journal.

[10]  P. Pascoe,et al.  Factors affecting incisional complication rates associated with colic surgery in horses: 78 cases (1983-1985). , 1989, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[11]  J. Romatowski Prevention and control of surgical wound infection. , 1989, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[12]  J. Levy,et al.  Surgical wound infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching hospital. , 1988, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[13]  Vasseur Pb,et al.  Infection rates in clean surgical procedures: a comparison of ampicillin prophylaxis vs a placebo. , 1985 .