Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry.

A signal passed at danger (SPAD) event occurs when a train moves past a stop signal into a section of unauthorised track. SPAD events are frequently attributed to driver distraction and inattention, but few studies have explored the failure mode from the perspective of task demand and the ability of the driver to self-regulate in response to competing activities. This study aimed to provide a more informed understanding of distraction, inattention and SPAD-risk in the passenger rail task. The research approach combined focus groups with a generative task designed to stimulate situational insight. Twenty-eight train drivers participated from 8 different rail operators in Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed thematically and revealed several moderating factors for driver distraction. Time-keeping pressure and certain aspects of the driver-controller dynamic were considered to distort performance, and distractions from station dwelling and novel events increased SPAD-risk. The results are conceptualised in a succinct model of distraction linking multiple factors with mechanisms that induced the attentional shift. The commonalities and inter-dynamics of the factors revealed insight into driving anxiety in the passenger rail mode, and suggested that SPAD-risk was intensified when three or more factors converged. The paper discusses these issues in the context of misappropriated attention, taxonomic implications, and directions for future research.

[1]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems , 2011 .

[4]  P Van Elslande,et al.  Attentional competition between tasks and ITS implications , 2010 .

[5]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .

[6]  Eric Rodgman,et al.  Driver's exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[9]  Anjum Naweed Hurry Up and Wait: Danger Signals in the Rail Environment , 2013 .

[10]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Scaling generative scaffolds towards train driving expertise , 2012 .

[11]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Defining Driver Distraction , 2005 .

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Two strategies for learning a route in a driving simulator. , 1997 .

[13]  A Naweed,et al.  Designing simulator tools for rail research: the case study of a train driving microworld. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  John D. Lee,et al.  Defining Driver Distraction , 2009 .

[15]  John R Wilson,et al.  Rail human factors: Past, present and future. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  John R. Treat,et al.  A study of precrash factors involved in traffic accidents , 1980 .

[17]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Andrew Parkes,et al.  An investigation of train driver visual strategies , 2006, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[19]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Perceptions and experiences of simulators as a training tool in transport: The case of the Australian rail industry , 2012 .

[20]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Simulator integration in the rail industry: the Robocop problem , 2013 .

[21]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[22]  Steve Howard,et al.  Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context , 1998, INTR.

[23]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[24]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[25]  Julia Pitsopoulos,et al.  Development of a Train Driver Education Programme on Mobile Phone Risk , 2010 .

[26]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  A Naweed,et al.  Investigations into the skills of modern and traditional train driving. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Eliciting and Representing the Knowledge of Experts , 2006 .

[29]  C M Pollock,et al.  The influence of sustained attention on railway accidents. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Neville Moray,et al.  Analysing and modelling train driver performance. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[31]  P Branton Investigations into the skills of train-driving. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[32]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .