Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics Peer Effects , Social Multipliers and Migrants at School : An International Comparison

This article analyses the school performance of migrants dependent on peer groups in different international schooling environments. Using data from the international OECD PISA test, we consider social interaction within and between groups of natives and migrants. Results based on social multipliers (Glaeser et al. 2000, 2003) suggest that both native-tonative and migrant-to-migrant peer effects are higher in ability-differencing school systems than in comprehensive schools. Thus, non-comprehensive school systems seem to magnify the already existing educational inequality between students with a low parental socioeconomic migration background and children from more privileged families. Students with a migration background and a disadvantageous parental status would benefit from higher diversity within schools.

[1]  Dragos Radu Social Interactions in Economic Models of Migration: A Review and Appraisal , 2008 .

[2]  H. Entorf,et al.  What a Difference Immigration Policy Makes: A Comparison of PISA Scores in Europe and Traditional Countries of Immigration , 2005 .

[3]  K. Michaelowa,et al.  Peer Effects and Textbooks in Primary Education: Evidence from Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Sylke V. Schnepf,et al.  How Different are Immigrants? A Cross-Country and Cross-Survey Analysis of Educational Achievement , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  R. Riphahn,et al.  Heterogeneity in the intergenerational transmission of educational attainment: evidence from Switzerland on natives and second-generation immigrants , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Kerstin Schneider,et al.  International Differences in Student Achievement: An Economic Perspective , 2004 .

[7]  V. Meier Choosing between School Systems: The Risk of Failure , 2004 .

[8]  Christian Dustmann,et al.  Parental background, secondary school track choice, and wages , 2004 .

[9]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Does School Integration Generate Peer Effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Does Peer Ability Affect Student Achievement , 2003 .

[11]  P. McEwan Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile , 2003 .

[12]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  The causal effect of class size on scholastic achievement: distinguishing the pure class size effect from the effect of changes in class composition* , 2002 .

[13]  Gert G. Wagner,et al.  Economic and Social Perspectives of Immigrant Children in Germany , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  J. Ours,et al.  The educational attainment of second-generation immigrants in The Netherland , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  G. Brunello,et al.  Stratified or Comprehensive? The Economic Efficiency of School Design , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Jesse Levin,et al.  For whom the reductions count: A quantile regression analysis of class size and peer effects on scholastic achievement , 2001 .

[17]  D. Epple,et al.  Ability Tracking, School Competition, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits , 2000 .

[18]  C. Hoxby,et al.  Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation , 2000 .

[19]  Ira N. Gang,et al.  Is Child Like Parent? Educational Attainment and Ethnic Origin , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[21]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SEGREGATION INDEXES , 1955 .

[22]  Andreas Ammermüller Poor Background or Low Returns? Why Immigrant Students in Germany Perform so Poorly in Pisa , 2005 .

[23]  Ludger Wößmann,et al.  • from the CESifo website: www.CESifo.deCESifo Working Paper No. 1235 WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR INTERNATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT PERFORMANCE? A RE-EXAMINATION USING PISA DATA , 2004 .

[24]  Ludger Wo ¨ ßmann Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions and Student Performance: the International Evidence , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Neubrand,et al.  PISA 2000: Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zusammenfassung zentraler Befunde , 2003 .

[26]  Petra Stanat Schulleistungen von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund: Differenzierung deskriptiver Befunde aus PISA und PISA-E , 2003 .

[27]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Non-Market Interactions , 2000 .

[28]  Iza Bonn Who ' s to Blame ? The Determinants of German Students ' Achievement in the PISA 2000 Study , 2003 .

[29]  P. Foy,et al.  Sample Design , 2001 .

[30]  Ira N. Gang,et al.  Is Child Like Parent , 2000 .