Semantic activation of noun concepts in context.

A modified Stoop procedure was used to examine the role that context plays in guiding semantic access of unambiguous nouns in sentence contexts. The sentences either emphasized a high- or a low-dominant property of a noun that was the last word in the sentence or were control sentences. Each sentence was followed by the relevant high- or low-dominant property either immediately or after a 300-or 600-ms delay. There was significant color-naming interference (relative to control) for high-dominant properties regardless of biasing context in the immediate and delayed conditions. There was also significant color-naming interference for low-dominant properties in the immediate condition regardless of context. However, in the delayed conditions, the low-dominant properties led to color-naming interference only when preceded by sentence contexts biasing interpretation toward the low-dominant property. It was concluded that high-dominant properties function as core, or invariant, aspects of meaning and that initial semantic access is context independent. Language: en

[1]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Stimulus encoding and memory. , 1972 .

[2]  F N Dyer,et al.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[3]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences , 1973 .

[4]  J. Bransford,et al.  Comprehension and semantic flexibility , 1974 .

[5]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[7]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[8]  M. Ashcraft.  Priming and property dominance effects in semantic memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[10]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Meaning, amount of processing, and memory for words , 1978 .

[11]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[12]  J. Yates,et al.  Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words , 1978 .

[13]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Semantic factors in cognition , 1978 .

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[15]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information Linguistic Context and the Priming of Semantic Information , 2022 .

[16]  A. McClelland,et al.  The effects of search criteria and retrieval cue availability on memory for words , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[17]  R. Sperber,et al.  Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading comprehension skill , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[18]  D. Swinney,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias , 1981 .

[19]  G. Simpson.  Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .

[20]  A. Koriat,et al.  Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[21]  P. Tabossi.  Sentential Context and the Interpretation of Unambiguous Words , 1982 .

[22]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Gregg C. Oden,et al.  Influence of Context on the Activation and Selection of Ambiguous Word Senses , 1983 .