Causes and Consequences of Social Interaction on the Internet: A Conceptual Framework

Increasingly, people are connecting to the Internet from their homes in order to interact with others. This article discusses research on Internet social interaction in terms of the following questions: What predicts who will look for and form social relationships on the Internet and who won't? How do people present themselves to others over the Internet? How is social interaction on the Internet similar and different from the more traditional forms of interaction? And what are the consequences of participating in Internet groups and interacting with others one-on-one for the individual's self concept and social relationships? The conceptual framework offered here organizes research on the social psychology of the Internet into three time phases (before, during, and after extensive social interactions and group participation) and two distinct types of motivations that drive Internet social behavior (self-related and socially related). After a review of the research on these issues so far we conclude that ...

[1]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[2]  Peter Burke,et al.  The Measurement of Role Identity , 1977 .

[3]  T. Morton.  Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. , 1978 .

[4]  E. Spreitzer,et al.  Multiple Roles and Psychological Well-Being , 1979 .

[5]  M. J. Won-Doornink.  On getting to know you: The association between the stage of a relationship and reciprocity of self-disclosure , 1979 .

[6]  L. Verbrugge.  Comment on Walter R. Gove and Michael Hughes, "Possible Causes of the Apparent Sex Differences in Physical Health" , 1980 .

[7]  L. Verbrugge,et al.  Multiple roles and physical health of women and men. , 1983, Journal of health and social behavior.

[8]  M. Leary.  Social anxiousness: the construct and its measurement. , 1983, Journal of personality assessment.

[9]  E. E. Jones.  Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships , 1984 .

[10]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. , 1985 .

[11]  L. Verbrugge.  Role burdens and physical health of women and men. , 1986, Women & health.

[12]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Striving for Specific Identities: The Social Reality of Self-Symbolizing , 1986 .

[13]  J. Beniger.  Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo-Community , 1987 .

[14]  E. Higgins,et al.  Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. , 1987, Psychological review.

[15]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[16]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  D. E. Frable,et al.  Being and feeling unique: statistical deviance and psychological marginality. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[18]  K. Deaux.  Reconstructing Social Identity , 1993 .

[19]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Todd F. Heatherton,et al.  Personal Accounts of Successful Versus Failed Attempts at Life Change , 1994 .

[21]  D. Ruble,et al.  A phase model of transitions: cognitive and motivational consequences , 1994 .

[22]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[23]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[24]  K. Deaux,et al.  Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. , 1994 .

[25]  Y. Bat-Chava.  Group Identification and Self-Esteem of Deaf Adults , 1994 .

[26]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Mark Muraven,et al.  When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. , 1995 .

[28]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Effects of failure on subsequent performance: the importance of self-defining goals. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  James E. Katz,et al.  A nation of strangers? , 1997, CACM.

[31]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[32]  J. Walther.  Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration , 1997 .

[33]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[34]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Coming Out in the Age of the Internet: Identity “Demarginalization” Through Virtual Group Participation , 1998 .