Machine learning of clinical performance in a pancreatic cancer database

OBJECTIVE We consider predictive models for clinical performance of pancreatic cancer patients based on machine learning techniques. The predictive performance of machine learning is compared with that of the linear and logistic regression techniques that dominate the medical oncology literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS We construct predictive models over a clinical database that we have developed for the University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital in Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. The database contains retrospective records of 91 patient treatments for pancreatic tumors. Classification and regression targets include patient survival time, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) quality of life scores, surgical outcomes, and tumor characteristics. The predictive performance of several techniques is described, and specific models are presented. RESULTS We show that machine learning techniques attain a predictive performance that is as good as, or better than, that of linear and logistic regression, for target attributes that include tumor N and T stage, survival time, and ECOG quality of life scores. Bayesian techniques are found to provide the best performance overall. For tumor size as the target attribute, however, logistic regression (respectively linear regression in the case of a numerical as opposed to discrete target) performs best. Preprocessing in the form of attribute selection and supervised attribute discretization improves predictive performance for most of the predictive techniques and target attributes considered. CONCLUSION Machine learning provides techniques for improved prediction of clinical performance. These techniques therefore merit consideration as valuable alternatives to traditional multivariate regression techniques in clinical medical studies.

[1]  Walter G. Gunn Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[2]  S. Cessie,et al.  Ridge Estimators in Logistic Regression , 1992 .

[3]  Bernhard Pfahringer,et al.  Locally Weighted Naive Bayes , 2002, UAI.

[4]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Discrete and Numeric Class Machine Learning , 1999, ICML.

[5]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[6]  M. Lerch,et al.  Joint Meeting of the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) , 2008, Pancreatology.

[7]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[8]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  J. R. Quinlan Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[10]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  Locally Weighted Learning , 1997, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[11]  Colin M. MacLeod,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents , 1949 .

[12]  N. Lavrac,et al.  Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology , 1997 .

[13]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[14]  A. Silberman,et al.  Comparative Morbidity of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique: Implications for Patients With Breast Cancer , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[15]  L. Rikkers,et al.  The society for surgery of the alimentary tract postgraduate course , 1991 .

[16]  D. Kibler,et al.  Instance-based learning algorithms , 2004, Machine Learning.

[17]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Cancer incidence in five continents. , 1976, IARC scientific publications.

[18]  Y. Ku,et al.  Predicting factors for survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a management guideline. , 2003, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[19]  Robert C. Holte,et al.  Very Simple Classification Rules Perform Well on Most Commonly Used Datasets , 1993, Machine Learning.

[20]  Sergio A. Alvarez,et al.  Knowledge Discovery in Clinical Performance of Cancer Patients , 2006, IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine.

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[22]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[23]  I. Kononenko,et al.  Prognosing the Survival Time of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma using Machine Learning , 1997 .

[24]  David Heckerman,et al.  Bayesian Networks for Data Mining , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[25]  Usama M. Fayyad,et al.  Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification Learning , 1993, IJCAI.

[26]  Thomas Howard,et al.  Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector Computed Tomography for Detecting and Staging Pancreatic Cancer , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[28]  John Moody,et al.  Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units , 1989, Neural Computation.

[29]  Murray F. Brennan,et al.  Prognostic Nomogram for Patients Undergoing Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[30]  D. Karnofsky The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer , 1949 .

[31]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[32]  David W. Aha,et al.  Instance-Based Learning Algorithms , 1991, Machine Learning.

[33]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.

[34]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[35]  Igor Kononenko,et al.  Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[36]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..