Fundamental properties of spatial light modulators for the approximate optical computation of Fourier transforms: a review

The performance of optical computers that include programmable Fourier optics depends intimately both on the physical characteristics of the particular spatial light modulator (SLM) and on the particular algorithms that map the ideal signal into the available modulation range of the SLM. Since practical affordable SLMs represent only a limited range of values in the complex plane (e.g., phase-only or quantized phase), numerous approaches have been reported to represent, approximate, encode or map complex values onto the available SLM states. The best approach depends on the space-bandwidth product (SBWP) of the signal, number of SLM pixels, computation time of encoding, the required response time of the application, and the resulting performance of the optical computer. My review of various methods, as applied to most current SLMs, which have a relatively low number of high cost pixels, leads me to recommend encoding algorithms that address the entire usable frequency plane and that emphasize the fidelity of the approximated Fourier transform over maximization of diffraction efficiency and minimization of approximation error. Frequency-dependent diffraction efficiency (due to pixel fill factor of discrete SLMs or resolution of spatially continuous SLMs) is also evaluated as a factor that can limit usable SBWP and possibly modify the choice of encoding method.

[1]  Frank Wyrowski,et al.  Digital phase holograms: Coding and quantization with an error diffusion concept , 1989 .

[2]  M Duelli,et al.  Modified minimum-distance criterion for blended random and nonrandom encoding. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  M Liang,et al.  Approximating fully complex spatial modulation with pseudorandom phase-only modulation. , 1994, Applied optics.

[4]  R. Juday Optimal realizable filters and the minimum Euclidean distance principle. , 1993, Applied optics.

[5]  Takeshi Takahashi,et al.  Phase-only matched filtering with dual liquid-crystal spatial light modulators , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  Markus E. Testorf,et al.  Implementation of Fourier array illuminators using pixelated SLM: efficiency limitations , 1999 .

[7]  R. Juday Correlation with a spatial light modulator having phase and amplitude cross coupling. , 1989, Applied optics.

[8]  M Duelli,et al.  Ternary pseudorandom encoding of Fourier transform holograms. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  N. C. Gallagher,et al.  Method for Computing Kinoforms that Reduces Image Reconstruction Error. , 1973, Applied optics.

[10]  A Mahalanobis,et al.  Optimal trade-off synthetic discriminant function filters for arbitrary devices. , 1994, Optics letters.

[11]  W J Dallas,et al.  Phase Quantization-a Compact Derivation. , 1971, Applied optics.

[12]  Robert W. Cohn,et al.  Fully complex diffractive optics by means of patterned diffuser arrays: encoding concept and implications for fabrication , 1997 .

[13]  R. Cohn,et al.  Enumeration of illumination and scanning modes from real-time spatial light modulators. , 2000, Optics express.

[14]  A. W. Lohmann,et al.  Computer-generated binary holograms , 1969 .

[15]  Ge,et al.  Improved-fidelity error diffusion through blending with pseudorandom encoding , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  D A Jared,et al.  Inclusion of filter modulation in synthetic-discriminant-function construction. , 1989, Applied optics.

[17]  F Wyrowski,et al.  Upper bound of the diffraction efficiency of diffractive phase elements. , 1991, Optics letters.

[18]  J W Goodman,et al.  Optimal maximum correlation filter for arbitrarily constrained devices. , 1989, Applied optics.

[19]  Alastair D. McAulay,et al.  Optical computer architectures , 1991 .

[20]  L. B. Lesem,et al.  The kinoform: a new wavefront reconstruction device , 1969 .

[21]  James M. Florence,et al.  Full-complex spatial filtering with a phase mostly DMD , 1991, Optics & Photonics.

[22]  Joseph N. Mait,et al.  Understanding diffractive optical design in the scalar domain , 1995, OSA Annual Meeting.

[23]  R. Cohn,et al.  Pseudorandom phase-only encoding of real-time spatial light modulators. , 1996, Applied optics.

[24]  C. Burckhardt Use of a random phase mask for the recording of fourier transform holograms of data masks. , 1970, Applied optics.

[25]  J Campos,et al.  Computation of arbitrarily constrained synthetic discriminant functions. , 1995, Applied optics.

[26]  Robert W. Cohn,et al.  Pseudorandom encoding of complex-valued functions onto amplitude-coupled phase modulators , 1998 .

[27]  M Liang,et al.  Random phase encoding of composite fully complex filters. , 1996, Optics letters.

[28]  Wenyao Liu,et al.  Pseudorandom encoding of fully complex modulation to biamplitude phase modulators , 1996 .

[29]  Robert W. Cohn Analyzing the encoding range of amplitude-phase coupled spatial light modulators , 1999 .

[30]  Duelli,et al.  Nonlinear effects of phase blurring on Fourier transform holograms , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  C B Burckhardt,et al.  A Simplification of Lee's Method of Generating Holograms by Computer. , 1970, Applied Optics.

[32]  V Arrizón,et al.  Efficiency limit of spatially quantized Fourier array illuminators. , 1997, Optics letters.