New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design

Abstract This work analyses how ergonomics and assembly system design techniques are intimately related. It also develops a new theoretical framework to assess a concurrent engineering approach to assembly systems design problems, in conjunction with an ergonomics optimization of the workplace. Its purpose is to provide professionals with a new and detailed approach to assembly system design procedures that includes ergonomics issues. The methodological framework offered takes into account technological variables (related to work times and methods), environmental variables (i.e. absenteeism, staff turnover, work force motivation) and ergonomics evaluations (i.e. human diversity) to create a comprehensive analysis. At conclusion of the study, the work reports data and insights from two real industrial cases, where an advanced simulation software is used, to validate the procedure and support methodology applicability. Relevance to industries This work provides an extremely valuable methodological framework to companies who recognize the link between assembly and ergonomics. The methodology underlines the necessity to analyze and classify the assembly system layout configuration in relation to both technological and environmental parameters- as reported in the framework.

[1]  Lars Hanson,et al.  Corporate-internal vs. national standard – A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing , 2009 .

[2]  Lars Hanson,et al.  A comparative study of digital human modelling simulation results and their outcomes in reality: A case study within manual assembly of automobiles , 2009 .

[3]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics - A case study of parallel and serial flow strategies , 2006 .

[4]  J Petzäll,et al.  Ergonomics in parallelized car assembly: a case study, with reference also to productivity aspects. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Armin Scholl,et al.  Balancing and Sequencing of Assembly Lines , 1995 .

[6]  Sigvard Rubenowitz,et al.  Survey and intervention of ergonomic problems at the workplace , 1997 .

[7]  Anders Sundin,et al.  A different perspective in participatory ergonomics in product development improves assembly work in the automotive industry , 2004 .

[8]  J Eklund,et al.  Ergonomics, quality and continuous improvement--conceptual and empirical relationships in an industrial context. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[9]  W Patrick Neumann,et al.  Integrating ergonomics into production system development--the Volvo Powertrain case. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Keith Popplewell,et al.  A review of the support tools for the process of assembly method selection and assembly planning , 2003 .

[11]  M A Sinclair,et al.  On complexity, process ownership and organisational learning in manufacturing organisations, from an ergonomics perspective. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  R Kadefors,et al.  Musculoskeletal symptoms due to technical preconditions in long cycle time work in an automobile assembly plant: a study of prevalence and relation to psychosocial factors and physical exposure. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  François Daniellou,et al.  Activity analysis in participatory design and analysis of participatory design activity , 1995 .

[14]  Lars Medbo,et al.  Ergonomic and technical aspects in the redesign of material supply systems: Big boxes vs. narrow bins , 2010 .

[15]  Daria Battini,et al.  Performance measurement in supply chains: new network analysis and entropic indexes , 2010 .

[16]  Armin Scholl,et al.  A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  M A Sinclair,et al.  Ergonomics issues in future systems , 2007, Ergonomics.

[18]  J A Eklund,et al.  Relationships between ergonomics and quality in assembly work. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  François Daniellou,et al.  Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design , 2007 .

[20]  C. Drury.  Global quality: Linking ergonomics and production , 2000 .

[21]  P. Vink,et al.  ERGOtool for the integral improvement of ergonomics and process flow in assembly , 2002 .

[22]  Jan Dul,et al.  Ergonomics Contributions to Company Strategies , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  R Kadefors,et al.  A cube model for the classification of work with hand tools and the formulation of functional requirements. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Leonid A. Bunimovich,et al.  Dynamics of Two- and Three-Worker "Bucket Brigade" Production Lines , 1999, Oper. Res..

[25]  E. J. Carey,et al.  Evaluation of human postures with computer aids and virtual workplace designs , 2002 .

[26]  Raymond W. McGorry,et al.  NIRS application in evaluating threaded-fastener driving assembly tasks , 2010 .

[27]  Maurizio Faccio,et al.  Balancing–sequencing procedure for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity , 2009 .

[28]  G. H. Tuinzaad,et al.  A participatory and integrative approach to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly , 2003 .

[29]  Maurizio Faccio,et al.  Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system in case of low product demand , 2007 .

[30]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Data collection and analysis of manual work using video recording and personal computer techniques , 1997 .