Supervised Distributed Multi-Instance and Unsupervised Single-Instance Autoencoder Machine Learning for Damage Diagnostics with High-Dimensional Data - A Hybrid Approach and Comparison Study

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a promising technique for in-service inspection of technical structures in a broad field of applications in order to reduce maintenance efforts as well as the overall structural weight. SHM is basically an inverse problem deriving physical properties such as damages or material inhomogeneity (target features) from sensor data. Often models defining the relationship between predictable features and sensors are required but not available. The main objective of this work is the investigation of model-free distributed machine learning (DML) for damage diagnostics under resource and failure constraints by using multi-instance ensemble and model fusion strategies and featuring improved scaling and stability compared with centralised single-instance approaches. The diagnostic system delivers two features: A binary damage classification (damaged or non-damaged) and an estimation of the spatial damage position in case of a damaged structure. The proposed damage diagnostics architecture should be able to be used in low-resource sensor networks with soft real-time capabilities. Two different machine learning methodologies and architectures are evaluated and compared posing low- and high-resolution sensor processing for low- and high-resolution damage diagnostics, i.e., a dedicated supervised trained low-resource and an unsupervised trained high-resource deep learning approach, respectively. In both architectures state-based recurrent artificial neural networks are used that process spatially and time-resolved sensor data from experimental ultrasonic guided wave measurements of a hybrid material (carbon fibre laminate) plate with pseudo defects. Finally, both architectures can be fused to a hybrid architecture with improved damage detection accuracy and reliability. An extensive evaluation of the damage prediction by both systems shows high reliability and accuracy of damage detection and localisation, even by the distributed multi-instance architecture with a resolution in the order of the sensor distance.

[1]  Peter Wierach,et al.  Mode Selective Actuator-Sensor System for Lamb Wave-Based Structural Health Monitoring , 2014 .

[2]  Martin Ester,et al.  Density‐based clustering , 2019, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[3]  Kaushal K. Shukla,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Discrete Wavelet Transform , 2013, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.

[4]  Learning Damage Event Discriminator Functions with Distributed Multi-instance RNN/LSTM Machine Learning - Mastering the Challenge , 2020 .

[5]  Lian Duan,et al.  A Local Density Based Spatial Clustering Algorithm with Noise , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[6]  J. Michaels,et al.  Feature Extraction and Sensor Fusion for Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring Under Changing Environmental Conditions , 2009, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[7]  Maria Moix-Bonet,et al.  Damage Introduction, Detection, and Assessment at CFRP Door Surrounding Panel , 2016 .

[8]  Rana Fayyaz Ahmad,et al.  Feature extraction and classification for EEG signals using wavelet transform and machine learning techniques , 2015, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[9]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring system design using finite element analysis , 2002, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Xia Zhao,et al.  Distributed structural health monitoring system based on smart wireless sensor and multi-agent technology , 2006 .

[11]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[12]  Armin Lechleiter,et al.  A hybrid approach for Structural Monitoring with self-organizing multi-agent systems and inverse numerical methods in material-embedded sensor networks , 2016 .

[13]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability , 2011 .

[14]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  Damage Identification in Structural Health Monitoring: A Brief Review from its Implementation to the Use of Data-Driven Applications , 2020, Sensors.

[15]  Michael Giering,et al.  Deep Learning for Structural Health Monitoring : A Damage Characterization Application , 2016 .

[16]  Roger M. Groves,et al.  DeepSHM: a deep learning approach for structural health monitoring based on guided Lamb wave technique , 2019, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[17]  Hui Li,et al.  Computer vision and deep learning–based data anomaly detection method for structural health monitoring , 2019 .

[18]  Luis Roseiro,et al.  Neural networks in damage detection of composite laminated plates , 2005 .