Long-Term Weight Management Using Wearable Technology in Overweight and Obese Adults: Systematic Review

Background Although there are many wearable devices available to help people lose weight and decrease the rising prevalence of obesity, the effectiveness of these devices in long-term weight management has not been established. Objective This study aimed to systematically review the literature on using wearable technology for long-term weight loss in overweight and obese adults. Methods We searched the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, Compendex, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies that took measurements for a period of ≥1 year (long-term) and had adult participants with a BMI >24. A total of 2 reviewers screened titles and abstracts and assessed the selected full-text papers for eligibility. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the following tools appropriate for different study types: the Cochrane risk of bias tool, Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions, A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, and 6 questions to trigger critical thinking. The results of the studies have been provided in a narrative summary. Results We included five intervention studies: four randomized controlled trials and one nonrandomized study. In addition, we used insights from six systematic reviews, four commentary papers, and a dissertation. The interventions delivered by wearable devices did not show a benefit over comparator interventions, but overweight and obese participants still lost weight over time. The included intervention studies were likely to suffer from bias. Significant variances in objectives, methods, and results of included studies prevented meta-analysis. Conclusions This review showed some evidence that wearable devices can improve long-term physical activity and weight loss outcomes, but there was not enough evidence to show a benefit over the comparator methods. A major issue is the challenge of separating the effect of decreasing use of wearable devices over time from the effect of the wearable devices on the outcomes. Consistency in study methods is needed in future long-term studies on the use of wearable devices for weight loss. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42018096932; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=96932

[1]  James W. Anderson,et al.  Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. , 2001, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Impact of Interventions that Integrate Accelerometers on Physical Activity and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review , 2017, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[3]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[4]  J. Kuk,et al.  Individuals Underestimate Moderate and Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  KATHERINE ELLIS,et al.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  L. Neubeck,et al.  Effectiveness, acceptability and usefulness of mobile applications for cardiovascular disease self-management: Systematic review with meta-synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data , 2018, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[7]  M. Hadders‐Algra,et al.  How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? , 2008, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[8]  S. Gortmaker,et al.  Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK , 2011, The Lancet.

[9]  R. Wing,et al.  Successful weight loss maintenance. , 2003, Annual review of nutrition.

[10]  Doina Kulick,et al.  Wearable Technology and Long-term Weight Loss. , 2017, JAMA.

[11]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Effect of a stepped-care intervention approach on weight loss in adults: a randomized clinical trial. , 2012, JAMA.

[12]  Luohua Jiang,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of a Web-Based Diabetes Prevention Program: 2-Year Results of a Single-Arm Longitudinal Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  L. Lyzwinski,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Devices and Weight Loss with an Intervention Content Analysis , 2014, Journal of personalized medicine.

[14]  Janna D Stephens,et al.  Technology-assisted weight management interventions: systematic review of clinical trials. , 2014, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  J. Clemensen,et al.  Drivers for successful long-term lifestyle change, the role of e-health: a qualitative interview study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[16]  Scott W Cheatham,et al.  The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review. , 2017, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[17]  M. Marcus,et al.  Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[18]  Jason J. Saleem,et al.  Wearable Heart Rate Monitor Technology Accuracy in Research: A Comparative Study Between PPG and ECG Technology , 2017 .

[19]  M. Hernán,et al.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[20]  B. Spring,et al.  Technology Interventions to Curb Obesity: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature , 2012, Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports.

[21]  C. Fabian,et al.  Change in physical activity during a weight management intervention for breast cancer survivors: Association with weight outcomes , 2017, Obesity.

[22]  S. Kelders,et al.  Persuasive System Design Does Matter: A Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[23]  Ioana R. Podina,et al.  Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Multicomponent Behavioral E-Health Interventions for Weight Loss , 2018, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  H. Aveyard,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Critical Thinking and Writing in Health and Social Care , 2011 .

[25]  Simone V Gill,et al.  Obesity, functional mobility and quality of life. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[26]  Xavier Pi-Sunyer,et al.  The Medical Risks of Obesity , 2009, Postgraduate medicine.

[27]  R. Wing,et al.  The prevalence of weight loss maintenance among American adults , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[28]  S. Belle,et al.  Wearable Technology and Long-term Weight Loss-Reply. , 2017, JAMA.

[29]  M. Pavel,et al.  Advancing Models and Theories for Digital Behavior Change Interventions. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  C. Bias The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011 .

[31]  M. Benzeval,et al.  A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies , 2011, BMC public health.

[32]  O. Dyer Wearable fitness device does not help maintain weight loss, study finds , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[33]  J. Sterne,et al.  The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  B. Caballero The global epidemic of obesity: an overview. , 2007, Epidemiologic reviews.