Utility of risk-based chlamydia testing in primary care: analysis of retrospective surveillance data among women in Melbourne, Australia.

Background Chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) continues to be a public health challenge in Australia, with some contention as to the best screening approach. In the present study we examined chlamydia testing, positivity and sexual behaviour among women with the aim of informing targeted testing among women aged ≥30 years. METHODS A longitudinal analysis was conducted on retrospective surveillance data collected among women attending general practice, family planning and sexual health clinics participating in sentinel surveillance in Melbourne, Australia. Women were aged ≥16 years and underwent urogenital testing for C. trachomatis (chlamydia) at participating clinics between 2007 and 2014. Chlamydia incidence was calculated as positive chlamydia tests over person-years (PY) among women and reported by 5-year age groups. A Cox regression model examined correlates of a positive chlamydia test among women aged ≥30 years. RESULTS In all, 36770 women contributed 46432 PY and 52395 chlamydia tests, of which 2895 were positive. The overall chlamydia incidence rate was 6.2 per 100 PY (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0-6.5). Chlamydia incidence declined with age, plateauing to <5 per 100 PY among women aged ≥30 years. Among women aged ≥30 years, being born in North-East Asia (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.9; 95% CI 1.9-4.5) and reporting multiple partners (aHR 2.5; 95% CI 1.8-3.5) in the past 12 months were associated with a positive chlamydia test. CONCLUSIONS Chlamydia control remains challenging in Australia and optimising testing in primary care is a key priority. The results of the present study suggest that, at least among women aged ≥30 years, chlamydia testing should be risk-based and informed by appropriate sexual history taking.

[1]  N. Low,et al.  S09.3 The impact of screening on chlamydia transmission in australia -– a mathematical modelling study , 2015 .

[2]  M. Temple-Smith.  S09.1 How can chlamydia screening work in australian general practice? , 2015 .

[3]  R. Guy,et al.  Reattendance and chlamydia retesting rates at 12 months among young people attending Australian general practice clinics 2007-10: a longitudinal study. , 2014, Sexual health.

[4]  R. Guy,et al.  Chlamydia testing and retesting patterns at family planning clinics in Australia. , 2013, Sexual health.

[5]  G. Luscombe,et al.  When online becomes offline: attitudes to safer sex practices in older and younger women using an Australian internet dating service. , 2012, Sexual health.

[6]  S. Liska,et al.  Reduction in unnecessary Chlamydia screening among older women at title X-funded family planning sites following a structural intervention--San Francisco, 2009. , 2011, Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

[7]  R. Guy,et al.  Establishing a linked sentinel surveillance system for blood-borne viruses and sexually transmissible infections: methods, system attributes and early findings. , 2010, Sexual health.

[8]  David P Wilson,et al.  Coverage is the key for effective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in Australia. , 2008, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  L. Lim,et al.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis at the time of routine Pap smear in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  S. Randall,et al.  Screening for chlamydia: seize the day , 2005, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[11]  Charlotte Gaydos,et al.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Asymptomatic Women Attending Family Planning Clinics: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Three Strategies , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.