On-chip measurements of cell compressibility via acoustic radiation.

Measurements of mechanical properties of biological cells are of great importance because changes in these properties can be strongly associated with the progression of cell differentiation and cell diseases. Although state of the art methods, such as atomic force microscopy, optical tweezers and micropipette aspiration, have been widely used to measure the mechanical properties of biological cells, all these methods involve direct contact with the cell and the measurements could be affected by the contact or any local deformation. In addition, all these methods typically deduced the Young's modulus of the cells based on their measurements. Herein, we report a new method for fast and direct measurement of the compressibility or bulk modulus of various cell lines on a microchip. In this method, the whole cell is exposed to acoustic radiation force without any direct contact. The method exploits the formation of an acoustic standing wave within a straight microchannel. When the polystyrene beads and cells are introduced into the channel, the acoustic radiation force moves them to the acoustic pressure node and the movement speed is dependent on the compressibility. By fitting the experimental and theoretical trajectories of the beads and the cells, the compressibility of the cells can be obtained. We find that the compressibility of various cancer cells (MCF-7: 4.22 ± 0.19 × 10(-10) Pa(-1), HEPG2: 4.28 ± 0.12 × 10(-10) Pa(-1), HT-29: 4.04 ± 0.16 × 10(-10) Pa(-1)) is higher than that of normal breast cells (3.77 ± 0.09 × 10(-10) Pa(-1)) and fibroblast cells (3.78 ± 0.17 × 10(-10) Pa(-1)). This work demonstrates a novel acoustic-based method for on-chip measurements of cell compressibility, complementing existing methods for measuring the mechanical properties of biological cells.

[1]  C. Rotsch,et al.  Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Z. Stachura,et al.  Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[3]  Kidong Park,et al.  Measurement of adherent cell mass and growth , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  S Chien,et al.  Theoretical and experimental studies on viscoelastic properties of erythrocyte membrane. , 1978, Biophysical journal.

[6]  P K Hansma,et al.  Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[7]  S. Hénon,et al.  A new determination of the shear modulus of the human erythrocyte membrane using optical tweezers. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Robert E. Apfel,et al.  Extension of acoustic levitation to include the study of micron‐size particles in a more compressible host liquid , 1982 .

[9]  G. Assmann,et al.  Detection of the metastatic potential of blood-borne and immunomagnetically enriched epithelial cells by quantitative erbB-2 RT-PCR , 1996, Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

[10]  K. Shortman The density distribution of thymus, thoracic duct and spleen lymphocytes , 1971, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  J. Clot,et al.  Age-dependent changes of human blood lymphocyte subpopulations. , 1978, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[12]  G. Assmann,et al.  An immunological enrichment method for epithelial cells from peripheral blood. , 1995, Journal of immunological methods.

[13]  T. Okada,et al.  Acoustic recognition of counterions in ion-exchange resins. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  I. Titushkin,et al.  Distinct membrane mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells determined using laser optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  R. Skalak,et al.  Passive mechanical properties of human leukocytes. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Falk Wottawah,et al.  Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping. , 2009, Cancer research.

[17]  T. Laurell,et al.  Free flow acoustophoresis: microfluidic-based mode of particle and cell separation. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  C. Lim,et al.  Probing the Elasticity of Breast Cancer Cells Using AFM , 2009 .

[19]  Maciej Zborowski,et al.  Quantitative intracellular magnetic nanoparticle uptake measured by live cell magnetophoresis , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[20]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  K. Yosioka,et al.  Acoustic radiation pressure on a compressible sphere , 1955 .

[22]  R. Leif,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF BUOYANT DENSITY OF HUMAN ERYTHROCYTES IN BOVINE ALBUMIN SOLUTIONS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[24]  J. Rao,et al.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[25]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic moduli of entangled actin networks using an oscillating magnetic bead micro-rheometer. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[26]  W. Hendee,et al.  Effects of particle shape and orientation on propagation of sound in suspensions , 1978 .

[27]  Kuo-Kang Liu,et al.  Optical tweezers for single cells , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  Substrate influence on cell shape and cell mechanics: HepG2 cells spread on positively charged surfaces , 2009, Microscopy research and technique.

[29]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[30]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Single-Cell Elastography: Probing for Disease with the Atomic Force Microscope , 2004, Disease markers.

[31]  John P Wikswo,et al.  Measurement Techniques for Cellular Biomechanics In Vitro , 2008, Experimental biology and medicine.

[32]  M. Weiss,et al.  Probing the nanoscale viscoelasticity of intracellular fluids in living cells. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[33]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[34]  C. Lim,et al.  Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers , 2003 .

[35]  K. Shung,et al.  Acoustic measurement of erythrocyte compressibility. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  B. Kumpel,et al.  Flow cytometric characterisation of cells of differing densities isolated from human term placentae and enrichment of villous trophoblast cells. , 2005, Placenta.

[37]  D. Billington,et al.  Subpopulations of rat hepatocytes separated by Percoll density-gradient centrifugation show characteristics consistent with different acinar locations. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.