Bistatic and multistatic radar sensors for homeland security

The separation of transmitter and receiver in bistatic and multistatic radar sensors offers the system designer new and additional degrees of freedom to tailor solutions to specific applications. The receivers may be passive and hence largely immune to jamming. Passive systems that also use 'illuminators of opportunity' do not have to provide a potentially expensive transmitter. Multiple transmitters and or receivers can improve sensitivity, coverage, and importantly improve the opportunity to acquire a line of site to the target (without which detection is impossible). These advantages make this form of radar attractive for a variety of applications, many of which fit well with the needs of homeland security. Equally, however, the additional complexity of having a number of separated transmitters and receivers brings about new challenges that require careful understanding if these forms of sensors are to be routinely adopted for operational use.In this chapter the role of active and passive techniques as a support to homeland security is explored. The essentials of bistatic and netted radar are introduced which enables the relative strengths and weaknesses of these approaches to be outlined. In this way a foundation is provided against which a variety of potential applications may be explored.

[1]  H. Schwarzlander,et al.  Ambiguity function for a bistatic radar , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[2]  James Gordon,et al.  Results of a bistatic HF radar surface wave sea scatter experiment , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Television-based bistatic radar , 1986 .

[4]  John D. Sahr,et al.  Passive coherent scatter radar interferometer implementation, observations, and analysis , 2004 .

[5]  P. E. Howland,et al.  Target tracking using television-based bistatic radar , 1999 .

[6]  Chris Baker,et al.  Bistatic radar using spaceborne illuminator of opportunity , 2002 .

[7]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  A particle filtering approach to FM-band passive radar tracking and automatic target recognition , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  Kurt Kubik,et al.  Air target detection via bistatic radar based on LEOs communication signals , 2002 .

[9]  J. M. Hawkins An opportunistic bistatic radar , 1997 .

[10]  V. P. Yakubov,et al.  Passive radar detection of radioactive pollution , 1999, Application of the Conversion Research Results for International Cooperation. SIBCONVERS'99. Third International Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX246).

[11]  M. C. Budge,et al.  Passive coherent location radar demonstration , 2002, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (Cat. No.02EX540).

[12]  L.M. Ehrman,et al.  A robust algorithm for automatic target recognition using passive radar , 2004, Thirty-Sixth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[13]  John D. Sahr,et al.  The Manastash Ridge radar: A passive bistatic radar for upper atmospheric radio science , 1997 .

[14]  Hugh Griffiths From a different perspective: principles, practice and potential of bistatic radar , 2003, 2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695).

[15]  Eugene F. Greneker,et al.  The use of passive radar for mapping lightning channels in a thunderstorm , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Radar Conference (Cat. No. 03CH37474).

[16]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Bistatic radar using satellite-borne illuminators of opportunity , 1992 .