The Role of Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams: A Social Network Perspective

The importance of communication and trust in the context of global virtual teams has been noted and reiterated in the information systems (IS) literature. Yet precisely how communication and trust influence certain outcomes within virtual teams remains unresolved. In this study, we seek to contribute some clarity to the understanding of the theoretical linkages among trust, communication, and member performance in virtual teams. To this end, we identify and test three proposed models (additive, interaction, and mediation) describing the role of trust in its relationship with communication to explain performance. In testing the relationships, we note that the concepts of communication and trust are inherently relational and not properties of individuals. Thus, we argue that a social network approach is potentially more appropriate than attribute-based approaches that have been utilized in prior research. Our results indicate that the "mediating" model best explains how communication and trust work together to influence performance. Overall, the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on virtual teams by empirically reconciling conflicting views regarding the interrelationships between key constructs in the literature. Further, the study, through its adoption of the social network analysis approach, provides awareness within the IS research community of the strengths of applying network approaches in examining new organizational forms.

[1]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[2]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Introduction to the Special Issue on Trust in an Organizational Context , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[3]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[4]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[5]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[6]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[7]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  J. Miles,et al.  Applying regression & correlation : a guide for students and researchers , 2001 .

[9]  J. Webster,et al.  Comparing traditional and virtual group forms: identity, communication and trust in naturally occurring project teams , 2008 .

[10]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[11]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .

[13]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resource Management. , 1987 .

[14]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[15]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[16]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[17]  T. Valente,et al.  Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[18]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Vijay K. Vemuri,et al.  Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones , 2002 .

[20]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Developing Trust in Virtual Teams , 1997, HICSS.

[21]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using A Positivist Case Research Methodology To Test Three Competing Theories-In-Use Of Business Process Redesign , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[23]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[24]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysis , 1991 .

[25]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information about information: a taxonomy of views , 2010 .

[26]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Some political and cultural issues in the globalisation of software development: case experience from Britain and India , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[27]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[28]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[29]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  A framework for analyzing levels of analysis issues in studies of e-collaboration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[30]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams , 2006 .

[32]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? , 1979 .

[36]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Cynthia Stohl,et al.  13 A Bona Fide Perspective for the Future of Groups: Understanding Collaborating Groups , 2002 .

[38]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[39]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[40]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[41]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[43]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Globalwork : bridging distance, culture, and time , 1994 .

[46]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[47]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Networks in the knowledge economy , 2003 .

[49]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[50]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Relating Electronic Mail Use and Network Structure to R&D Work Networks and Performance , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Wesley S. Shu,et al.  Will the New Economy Emerge as Information Technology Pays Off? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Interactive Communication Technologies in Business Organizations , 1995 .

[53]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[54]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  F. Morgeson,et al.  SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[56]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[57]  N. Panteli,et al.  The role of subgroups in the communication patterns of global virtual teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[58]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[59]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[60]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  ICIS Panel Summary: Should Institutional Trust Matter in Information Systems Research? , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  E. Wynn,et al.  Virtuality and Team Performance: Understanding the Impact of Variety of Practices , 2006 .

[62]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[63]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[64]  H. Keith Edwards,et al.  Analysis of Software Requirements Engineering Exercises in a Global Virtual Team Setup , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[65]  H. Ibarra.  NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[66]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  R. Burt.  The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[68]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[69]  C. Handy.  Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[70]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[71]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[72]  Dan J. Kim,et al.  Self-Perception-Based Versus Transference-Based Trust Determinants in Computer-Mediated Transactions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[74]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[75]  James T. Scarnati.  Beyond technical competence: developing mental toughness , 2000 .

[76]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams* , 2009 .

[77]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams: how do perceptions of IT's performance get formed? , 2004, DATB.

[78]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[79]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[80]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[81]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[82]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[83]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[84]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[85]  Anne Powell,et al.  Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[86]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Socio-Technical Interaction Networks in Free/Open Source Software Development Processes , 2005 .

[87]  M. Becerra,et al.  Perceived Trustworthiness Within The Organization: The Moderating Impact Of Communication Frequency , 2002 .

[88]  Anoop Madhok,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING MODERATORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUST BASED GOVERNANCE OF INTER-FIRM R & D COLLABORATION , 2002 .

[89]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Modeling Web Site Design Across Cultures: Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[90]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[91]  R. Cross,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. , 2002 .

[92]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[93]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  ICT Enabled Virtual Collaboration through Trust , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[94]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in Online Environments , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Rinie Geenen,et al.  Single‐item big five ratings in a social network design , 2008 .

[96]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams , 2000 .

[97]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[98]  R.J. Ocker,et al.  Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: a qualitative analysis of experimental teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[99]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[100]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[101]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[102]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  New media and organizing at the group level , 2002 .

[103]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[104]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Impact of User Satisfaction and Trust on Virtual Team Members , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..