Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction

A new combined lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) PET/CT scanner with an extended axial field-of-view (FOV) of 21.8 cm has been developed (Biograph TruePoint PET/CT with TrueV; Siemens Molecular Imaging) and introduced into clinical practice. The scanner includes the recently announced point spread function (PSF) reconstruction algorithm. The PET components incorporate four rings of 48 detector blocks, 5.4 cm times 5.4 cm in cross-section. Each block comprises a 13 times 13 matrix of 4 times 4 times 20 mm3 elements. Data are acquired with a 4.5 ns coincidence time window and an energy window of 425-650 keV. The physical performance of the new scanner has been evaluated according to the recently revised National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007 standard and the results have been compared with a previous PET/CT design that incorporates three rings of block detectors with an axial coverage of 16.2 cm (Biograph TruePoint PET/CT; Siemens Molecular Imaging). In addition to the phantom measurements, patient Noise Equivalent Count Rates (NECRs) have been estimated for a range of patients with different body weights (42-154 kg). The average spatial resolution is the same for both scanners: 4.4 mm (FWHM) and 5.0 mm (FWHM) at 1 cm and 10 cm respectively from the center of the transverse FOV. The scatter fractions of the Biograph TruePoint and Biograph TruePoint TrueV are comparable at 32%. Compared to the three ring design, the system sensitivity and peak NECR with smoothed randoms correction (1R) increase by 82% and 73%, respectively. The increase in sensitivity from the extended axial coverage of the Biograph TruePoint PET/CT with TrueV should allow a decrease in either scan time or injected dose without compromising diagnostic image quality. The contrast improvement with the PSF reconstruction potentially offers enhanced detectability for small lesions.

[1]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  T. Bruckbauer,et al.  Evaluation of clinical PET count rate performance , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[3]  M. Defrise,et al.  Fast reconstruction of 3-D PET data with accurate statistical modeling , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[4]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  C.C. Watson,et al.  Advances in scatter correction for 3D PET/CT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[6]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  C. Comtat,et al.  Fast reconstruction of 3-D PET data with accurate statistical modeling , 1997 .

[8]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[11]  Xuan Liu,et al.  Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography With A Large Axial Acceptance Angle: Signal-to-noise Considerations , 1990, 1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.