Caries Removal by Chemomechanical ( Carisolv TM ) and Conventional ( Airotor ) Methods – Comparative In-Vitro Study

Aim: To compare the caries removal efficacy between chemomechanical method (Carisolv) and conventional method (airotor) in freshly extracted molars. Materials And Methods: 100 freshly extracted molars with dentinal caries on the occlusal surface were selected. Of which, 50 teeth were treated with chemo-mechanical (Carisolv) and in the other 50 teeth by conventional (airotor) method. Completeness of caries removal and the amount of operating time taken were assessed for evaluating the efficacy of caries removal. Student ‘t’ test was used for comparing the efficacy between chemomechanical method and the conventional method. Results: There was a highly significant (p=0.000) difference observed for the mean operating times between complete caries removal using chemo-mechanical method (5.38 ± 0.93 minutes) and conventional method (2.92 ± 0.52 minutes). All of the 50 teeth had no decay in the cavity after the preparation with conventional method, whereas only 44 teeth out of 50 teeth were without decay when treated with chemo-mechanical method. The observed difference between the two methods was statistically significant (p=0.027). Conclusion: Chemo-mechanical method can be used as an effective clinical alternative operating procedure for the removing occlusal dentinal caries in cavitated teeth, which has controlled removal of tooth structure and helps in increasing the patients’ compliance.

[1]  A. Kush,et al.  Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & Study of an Indigen-ously Developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children. , 2013, Journal of international oral health : JIOH.

[2]  A. Hasan,et al.  Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv. , 2008, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[3]  N. Gugnani,et al.  Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. , 2007, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[4]  A. Kupietzky,et al.  First-choice treatment alternatives for caries removal using the chemomechanical method. , 2005, Quintessence international.

[5]  I. Balčiūnienė,et al.  Chemomechanical caries removal for children. , 2005, Stomatologija.

[6]  A. Polychronopoulou,et al.  Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. , 2004, Pediatric dentistry.

[7]  P. Atilla,et al.  In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrument in caries removal. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  G. Vougiouklakis,et al.  A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. , 2003, Quintessence international.

[9]  S. Doméjean-Orliaguet,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[10]  P. Nadanovsky,et al.  Removal of Caries Using only Hand Instruments: A Comparison of Mechanical and Chemo–Mechanical Methods , 2001, Caries Research.

[11]  E. Hellwig,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Molars and Its Acceptance by Patients , 2001, Caries Research.

[12]  T. Watson,et al.  Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques , 2000 .

[13]  D. Ericson,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of a New Method for Chemo–Mechanical Removal of Caries , 1999, Caries Research.

[14]  L. Samaranayake,et al.  Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.