The risk environment for HIV transmission: Results from the Atlanta and Flagstaff network studies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission may be facilitated or obstructed by network structure, incorporating a measure of risk that combines true risk and surrogates. Persons at presumed high risk for HIV were enrolled in long-term follow-up studies of urban and rural networks in Atlanta, Georgia, and Flagstaff, Arizona. We focused on respondents who were also contacts to evaluate information on both sides of the observed dyads and constructed a Risk Indicator, based on a four-digit binary number, that permitted assessment and visualization of the overall risk environment. We constructed graphs that provided visualization of the level of risk, the types of relationships, and the actual network. Although some of the findings conform to the hypotheses relating network structure to transmission, there were several anomalies. In Atlanta, HIV prevalence was most strongly related to men with a male sexual orientation, despite the widespread use of injectable drugs. In Flagstaff, an area of very low prevalence and no transmission, the risk environment appeared more intense, and the frequency of microstructures was as great or greater than representative areas in Atlanta. The network hypothesis is not yet sufficiently developed to account for empirical observations that demonstrate the presence of intense, interactive networks in the absence of transmission of HIV.

[1]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. , 1988, Science.

[2]  I. de Vincenzi,et al.  Probabilities of sexual HIV‐1 transmission , 1996, AIDS.

[3]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[4]  R. Anderson,et al.  Mathematical Models of the Transmission and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  A R Feinstein,et al.  P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  K. Holmes,et al.  Sexual Mixing Patterns of Patients Attending Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinics , 1996, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[7]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV , 1997, AIDS.

[8]  E. Laumann,et al.  Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. , 1999, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[9]  S. Greenland,et al.  Scientific standards of criticism: a reaction to "Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life," by A.R. Feinstein. , 1990, Epidemiology.

[10]  R. May,et al.  Networks of sexual contacts: implications for the pattern of spread of HIV , 1989, AIDS.

[11]  S Greenland,et al.  Randomization, Statistics, and Causal Inference , 1990, Epidemiology.

[12]  G. Taubes Epidemiology faces its limits. , 1995, Science.

[13]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Risk network structure in the early epidemic phase of HIV transmission in Colorado Springs , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[14]  D. D. Des Jarlais,et al.  HIV epidemiology and interventions among injecting drug users , 1996, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[15]  M Kretzschmar,et al.  Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. , 1996, Mathematical biosciences.

[16]  J. Wylie,et al.  Patterns of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Infection in Sexual Networks in Manitoba, Canada , 2001, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[17]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Sexual Network Structure and Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention: A Modeling Perspective , 2000, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[18]  M. Schechter,et al.  Determinants of HIV seroconversion in drug users during a period of rising prevalence in Vancouver , 1997 .

[19]  S. Goodman,et al.  p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  M. Schechter,et al.  Determinants of HIV seroconversion in injection drug users during a period of rising prevalence in Vancouver. , 1997, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[21]  A. Klovdahl,et al.  Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[22]  D. D. Des Jarlais,et al.  HIV incidence among injection drug users in New York City, 1992-1997: evidence for a declining epidemic. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[23]  Model trains of thought. , 1997, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[24]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[25]  R. Anderson,et al.  Factors controlling the spread of HIV in heterosexual communities in developing countries: patterns of mixing between different age and sexual activity classes. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  R. Royce,et al.  Sexual transmission of HIV. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation , 1999, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[28]  John J. Potterat,et al.  The Atlanta Urban Networks Study: a blueprint for endemic transmission , 2000, AIDS.

[29]  S. Blower,et al.  HIV transmission in sexual networks: an empirical analysis , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  S Q Muth,et al.  Sexual network structure as an indicator of epidemic phase. , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[31]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Social network dynamics and HIV transmission , 1998, AIDS.