Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND Increased use of computers and morbidity coding in primary care delivery and research brings a need for evidence of the quality of general practice medical records. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to assess the quality, in terms of completeness and correctness, of morbidity coding in computerized general practice records through a systematic review. METHODS Published studies were identified by searches of electronic databases and citations of collected papers. Assessment of each article was made by two independent observers and discrepancies resolved by consensus. Studies were reviewed qualitatively due to their heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. There was variation in the methodology and quality of studies, and problems in generalizability. Studies have attempted to assess the completeness and correctness of morbidity registers by reference to a gold standard such as paper notes, prescribing information or diagnostic tests and procedures, each of which has problems. A consistent finding was that quality of recording varied between morbidities. One reason for this may be in distinctiveness of diagnosis (e.g. coding of diabetes tended to be of higher quality than coding of asthma). CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the problems faced in assessing the completeness and correctness of computerized general practice medical records. However, it also suggests that a high quality of coding can be achieved. The focus should now be on methods to encourage and help practices improve the quality of their coding.

[1]  David Gerrett,et al.  A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Huw Thomas,et al.  Collecting morbidity data in general practice: the Somerset morbidity project , 1996, BMJ.

[3]  R. Newson,et al.  Better by half: hypertension in the elderly and the 'rule of halves': a primary care audit of the clinical computer record as a springboard to improving care. , 1999, Family practice.

[4]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional study of paper and computerised medical records , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  P L Heywood,et al.  Real world data--retrieval and validation of consultation data from four general practices. , 1996, Family practice.

[6]  R M Milne,et al.  Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  Susan S. Jick,et al.  Further validation of information recorded on a general practitioner based computerized data resource in the united kingdom , 1992 .

[8]  SIMON DE LUSIGNAN,et al.  Research Paper: Does Feedback Improve the Quality of Computerized Medical Records in Primary Care? , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  A. Hansell,et al.  Use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) for respiratory epidemiology: a comparison with the 4th Morbidity Survey in General Practice (MSGP4) , 1999, Thorax.

[10]  Philip J B Brown.  Electronic patient records in general practice , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Have the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in general practice improved in the last five years? The report of a two-practice pilot study , 1999 .

[12]  F. Sullivan,et al.  A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  P. Passmore,et al.  The importance of validating the diagnosis of coronary heart disease when measuring secondary prevention: a cross‐sectional study in general practice , 2002, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.

[14]  G M Leydon,et al.  Validation of the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in general practice database studies. , 2000, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[15]  A Gilliland,et al.  General practitioner records on computer--handle with care. , 1992, Family practice.

[16]  H Jick,et al.  Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. , 1991, BMJ.

[17]  Michael M. Wagner,et al.  Review: Accuracy of Data in Computer-based Patient Records , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  S Scobie,et al.  Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? , 1995, Journal of public health medicine.

[19]  A Haines,et al.  Accuracy of diagnosis of psychosis on general practice computer system. , 1993, BMJ.

[20]  A Bottomley,et al.  Methodology for assessing the prevalence of angina in primary care using practice based information in northern England. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[21]  D Mant,et al.  Completeness of chronic disease registration in general practice. , 1987, British medical journal.

[22]  Anderson Je.  Reliability of morbidity data in family practice. , 1980 .

[23]  D. Fleming,et al.  The measurement of morbidity in general practice. , 1991, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[24]  W. Bilker,et al.  Validity and completeness of the General Practice Research Database for studies of inflammatory bowel disease , 2002, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[25]  H Jick,et al.  The Demand for Eating Disorder Care , 1996, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[26]  D. Margolis,et al.  The incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers among elderly patients in general medical practice. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[27]  D. Mant,et al.  An assessment of morbidity registers for coronary heart disease in primary care. ASSIST (ASSessment of Implementation STrategy) trial collaborative group. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[28]  K. Thiru,et al.  Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  A Coulter,et al.  Computer held chronic disease registers in general practice: a validation study. , 1989, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[30]  M Pringle,et al.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.