A simulation-based method for air loop balancing and fan sizing using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

Two main tasks of commissioning an air-side HVAC system are to verify the fan capacity and to balance the air loop. Simulations can be of assistance to these two tasks. However, the models used in the simulation will inevitably have some uncertainties, especially for the models of the pressure loss components. This paper proposes to use uncertainty analysis to obtain the adjustment instructions for tuning the dampers and the fan pressure value for sizing the fan on a virtual testbed implemented in Modelica. An air-side system with eight terminals, ten dampers and seven junctions is taken as the use case. 24 correction factors for the pressure loss coefficients (PLC) (10 for the dampers, 14 for the junctions) are taken as the inputs for the uncertainty analysis. 1000 samples of the correction factors are generated by using the Latin Hypercube Sampling method. The proportional balancing method is adopted to determine the positions of the damper so that the designed terminal flow rates could be met. The fan pressure value is also determined accordingly. The distributions of the dampers’ positions and fan pressure can be used to guide the balancing work and fan sizing in practice. In addition, the sensitivity analysis reveals that the position adjustments and fan pressure results are more sensitive to the uncertainties of the dampers’ PLCs. When the uncertainty level of the dampers’ PLC is reduced from ±40% to ±10%, the ranges of the damper’s positions will be significantly narrowed down to less than 15%, and the 95th percentiles of the fan pressure will drop from 116Pa to 38Pa, which shows the practicality and benefit of the proposed method.

[1]  Ahmad K. Sleiti,et al.  Experimental determination and computational fluid dynamics predictions of pressure loss in close-coupled elbows (RP-1682) , 2017 .

[2]  Alessandro Prada,et al.  Uncertainty propagation of material properties in energy simulation of existing residential buildings: The role of buildings features , 2018 .

[3]  C. M. Mak,et al.  Pressure Losses across Multiple Fittings in Ventilation Ducts , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[4]  Jie Cui,et al.  Laminar Pressure Loss Coefficient in Close Coupled Fittings , 2006 .

[5]  Thierry S. Nouidui,et al.  Modelica Buildings library , 2014 .

[6]  Lei Chen,et al.  Study on local drag reduction effects of wedge-shaped components in elbow and T-junction close-coupled pipes , 2014 .

[7]  Wenjian Cai,et al.  Model-based method for testing, adjusting and balancing of HVAC duct system , 2016 .

[8]  M. Vořechovský Correlation control in small sample Monte Carlo type simulations II: Analysis of estimation formulas, random correlation and perfect uncorrelatedness , 2012 .

[9]  Stephen Idem,et al.  Pressure Loss Coefficient Measurements of Two Close-Coupled HVAC Elbows , 2005 .

[10]  Peng Xu,et al.  A new local pressure loss coefficient model of a duct tee junction applied during transient simulation of a HVAC air-side system , 2018 .

[11]  Mauro Luis Small,et al.  Non- Iterative Technique for Balancing an Air Distribution System , 2002 .

[12]  Yu-Pei Ke,et al.  Close Coupled Ductwork Fitting Pressure Drop , 1997 .

[13]  I. Idelchik Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[14]  Gireesh Nair,et al.  Energy evaluation of residential buildings: Performance gap analysis incorporating uncertainties in the evaluation methods , 2018 .

[15]  Li Shao,et al.  Effect on pressure loss of separation and orientation of closely coupled HVAC duct fittings , 2000 .

[16]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VENTILATION IN HIGH-RISE APARTMENT BUILDINGS , 2007 .

[17]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  k-factors for HVAC ducts: Numerical and experimental determination , 1995 .

[18]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Exploring HVAC system sizing under uncertainty , 2014 .

[19]  Peter Fritzson,et al.  Modelica - A Language for Equation-Based Physical Modeling and High Performance Simulation , 1998, PARA.

[20]  Fu Xiao,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of measurements in outdoor airflow control strategies , 2013, HVAC&R Research.

[21]  Luigi Pietro Maria Colombo,et al.  A non-iterative method for Testing, Adjusting and Balancing (TAB) air ducts systems: Theory, practical procedure and validation , 2013 .

[22]  Jie Cui,et al.  Numerical Study of Pressure Losses in Close-Coupled Fittings , 2004 .