Human error assessment during maintenance operations of marine systems – What are the effective environmental factors?

Human errors during maintenance operations are one of the most prevalent causes of marine accidents. Seafarers conduct marine system maintenance on-board in a challenging environment, which makes maintenance prone to un-intentional errors. To address this concern, the study of human performance during maintenance operations on ships is necessary as a part of maritime quantitative risk assessment. However, there is a significant lack of appropriate field data and information relating to human performance on-board ships. This study attempts to fill this important data and knowledge gap. It presents a data collection and analysis procedures for maintenance operations of marine systems. Data related to performance-affecting factors is collected from a total of 235 experienced seafarers from Engine Departments (ED) and Deck Departments (DD) through a structured questionnaire. The collected data is then analysed for normality and also for a pairwise significance test. It helps to study the generalization of the data and also to identify the relative importance of the performance-affecting factors. Collected data will help in developing human error assessment techniques for more accurate Human Error Probability (HEP) estimation in marine environmental conditions. Additionally, this study is useful for identifying the relative importance of performance-affecting factors for the maintenance operations of marine systems. Based on the results of this study, workload and stress, and ship motion (roll and pitch) are identified as critical factors affecting seafarers’ performance during maintenance operations. These identified high important performance-affecting factors will assist in future human reliability analysis and risk mitigation strategies for improving the safety and reliability of maintenance operations for the marine industry.

[1]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Determination of human error probabilities for the maintenance operations of marine engines , 2016 .

[2]  June J. Pilcher,et al.  Effects of hot and cold temperature exposure on performance: a meta-analytic review , 2002, Ergonomics.

[3]  A H Wertheim,et al.  Working in a moving environment. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[4]  K. X. Li,et al.  INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONVENTIONS: SEAFARERS'S SAFETY AND HUMAN RIGHTS. , 2002 .

[5]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[6]  Ozcan Arslan,et al.  SWOT analysis for safer carriage of bulk liquid chemicals in tankers. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Mustafa Insel,et al.  Crew noise exposure on board ships and comparative study of applicable standards , 2011 .

[8]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Offshore oil and gas occupational accidents—What is important? , 2006 .

[9]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety in shipping: the human element. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Rabiul Islam,et al.  Development of a monograph for human error likelihood assessment in marine operations , 2017 .

[11]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  An integrated method for human error probability assessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities , 2015 .

[12]  Dieter Hoffmann,et al.  Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research , 2013 .

[13]  N. Weinstein,et al.  Nonauditory Effects of Noise on Behavior and Health , 1981 .

[14]  Eric Tupper Introduction to Naval Architecture , 1996 .

[15]  Michael G. Parsons,et al.  Effects of motion at sea on crew performance: A survey , 2002 .

[16]  S. Stansfeld,et al.  Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[17]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  The role of human error in risk analysis: Application to pre- and post-maintenance procedures of process facilities , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Performance Response Under Thermal Stressors , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Xhelilaj Ermal,et al.  The Role Of Human Fatigue Factor Towards Maritime Casualties , 2010 .

[20]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[21]  Jonathan M Ross Human Factors for Naval Marine Vehicle Design and Operation , 2017 .

[22]  O. Turan,et al.  Human reliability analysis - Taxonomy and praxes of human entropy boundary conditions for marine and offshore applications , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Human Error Probability Assessment During Maintenance Activities of Marine Systems , 2017, Safety and health at work.

[24]  James W. Altschuld,et al.  Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide , 1995 .

[25]  Jørgen Riis Jepsen,et al.  Seafarer fatigue: a review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers' health and safety and options for mitigation. , 2015, International maritime health.

[26]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  Effects of Cold Environments on Human Reliability Assessment in Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Ken Parsons,et al.  Human Thermal Environments: The Effects of Hot, Moderate, and Cold Environments on Human Health, Comfort and Performance , 1999 .

[28]  Simon Green,et al.  A survey of the health stress and fatigue of Australian seafarers , 1997 .

[29]  J. L. Colwell Modeling Ship Motion Effects on Human Performance for Real Time Simulation , 2005 .

[30]  Emma Jane Kirsty Wadsworth,et al.  Seafarer fatigue: The Cardiff Research Programme , 2007 .

[31]  Kenneth A. Cunefare,et al.  Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration , 2000 .

[32]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Stress and human performance , 1996 .

[33]  H Berg,et al.  Human Factors and Safety Culture in Maritime Safety , 2013 .

[34]  Svein Kristiansen,et al.  Maritime Transportation: Safety Management and Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[35]  M. Eraut Learning from other people in the workplace , 2007 .