The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?

This paper applies a theory-driven approach to explore why the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice, in particular, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, has little or no apparent influence on clinical decision making. A theory-driven approach involves combining knowledge of whether and how an intervention works. It is argued that such an approach is currently lacking within the literature evaluating the effectiveness of feeding back HRQoL information to clinicians. The paper identifies a number of mechanisms that might give rise to the expected outcomes that are currently implicit within the design of the intervention and hypotheses specified within the trials evaluating the use of HRQoL measures in clinical practice. It then examines how far current clinical practice matches these mechanisms and in doing so, a number of possible explanations for the lack of impact of HRQoL on clinical decision making are reviewed. The influence of HRQoL information on clinical decision making depends on a large number of factors related to the design of the intervention, patients' and clinicians' desire to discuss HRQoL issues within the consultation and the legitimacy that clinicians give to HRQoL instruments. To date, knowledge of how the feedback of HRQoL information to clinicians might improve doctor-patient communication or clinical decision making has yet to sufficiently inform an assessment of whether these aspects of patient care are improved. The paper concludes by specifying how the feedback of HRQoL information to clinicians might be modified to maximise its impact on clinical decision making.

[1]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[2]  Charles G. Martin,et al.  Influence of data display formats on physician investigators' decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Medical talk and medical work , 1995 .

[4]  L E Kazis,et al.  Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  C. McKevitt,et al.  Quality of life: What, how, why?: The view of healthcare professionals , 2002 .

[6]  E. Gordon,et al.  Patient-nephrologist discussions about kidney transplantation as a treatment option. , 2000, Advances in renal replacement therapy.

[7]  P S Kurtin,et al.  Monitoring dialysis patients' health status. , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[8]  Jenny Morris,et al.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  N. Guberman,et al.  Impacts on practitioners of using research-based carer assessment tools: experiences from the UK, Canada and Sweden, with insights from Australia. , 2003, Health & social care in the community.

[10]  K. Cox Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials: interviews versus questionnaires. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[11]  M. Law,et al.  Measuring outcomes in children's rehabilitation: a decision protocol. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. , 2002, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[13]  T. Sheldon,et al.  Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcomes measures , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  S. Campbell,et al.  Measuring quality of life , 1997 .

[16]  S. Mallinson,et al.  Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[17]  T M Gill,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  R. Grol,et al.  Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. , 1994, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[19]  J Alonso,et al.  Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. , 2000, Medical care.

[20]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care , 2003, The Lancet.

[21]  James P. Connell and Anne C. Kubisch Applying a Theory of Change Approach to the Evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Progress, Prospects, and Problems , 1998 .

[22]  W. Tierney,et al.  Clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with asthma: an expert consensus panel report. , 2003, Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

[23]  N Bellamy,et al.  Quantitative rheumatology: a survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Canada. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  Gian Domenico Borasio,et al.  Patients' assessment of quality of life instruments: a randomised study of SIP, SF-36 and SEIQoL-DW in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2001, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[25]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  L. Dalgleish,et al.  What value is given to quality of life assessment by health professionals considering response to palliative chemotherapy for advanced cancer? , 1991, Cancer.

[27]  A. Coulter,et al.  Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia. , 1996, Quality in health care : QHC.

[28]  J. Wit,et al.  Clinicians' perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice , 2004, Acta paediatrica.

[29]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[30]  Ray Pawson,et al.  Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory , 2003 .

[31]  N K Aaronson,et al.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study. , 2001, JAMA.

[32]  J. Greenhalgh,et al.  Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice. , 1998, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[33]  A. Bezjak,et al.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: Results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[34]  D. Roter The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship. , 2000, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  A Preliminary Survey of Oncologists' Perceptions of Quality of Life Information , 1997, Psycho-oncology.

[36]  L. Carlson,et al.  Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[37]  K. Meadows,et al.  Attitudes to the use of health outcome questionnaires in the routine care of patients with diabetes: a survey of general practitioners and practice nurses. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[38]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  M. Espallargues,et al.  Provision of Feedback on Perceived Health Status to Health Care Professionals , 2000 .

[40]  D. Locker,et al.  Quality of life: a dynamic construct. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[41]  G. Wenger,et al.  Using network variation in practice: identification of support network type. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[42]  Galina Velikova,et al.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  C. van Weel,et al.  Management of patients with asthma and COPD: monitoring quality of life and the relationship to subsequent GP interventions. , 2001, Family practice.

[44]  B. Ehrenberg,et al.  Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients' care , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[45]  K. Meadows,et al.  The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[46]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  M. Marshall,et al.  Can a standardized needs assessment be used to improve the care of people with severe mental disorders? A pilot study of 'needs feedback'. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[48]  N. Britten,et al.  In Pursuit of Patient-Centred Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation of the ‘Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile’ , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[49]  A. Lelie,et al.  Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making? , 2000, Patient education and counseling.

[50]  G Bury,et al.  A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS , 1996, BMJ.

[51]  T. Sheldon,et al.  Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome – a systematic review , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[52]  R L Street,et al.  Using Health Status Surveys in Medical Consultations , 1994, Medical care.

[53]  N. Aaronson,et al.  How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  S. Hunt,et al.  The problem of quality of life , 1997, Quality of Life Research.