Unlimited editions: three approaches to the dissemination and display of digital art

The paper reflects on three approaches to the dissemination and display of digital art. \'1c"s[edition]\'1d" is a novel, web-based service that offers limited editions of "\'1cdigital prints"\'1d. Analysis of user comments suggests that the metaphor of a \'1c"limited digital edition"\'1d raises issues and to some extent is resisted. The second approach is the Flickr Brushes Gallery, where digital painters post images and comment on one another's work. Analysis of comment boards indicates that the shared art and comments are a form of gift exchange. Finally, the paper discusses a field study in which artists exhibited their work as it develops over time in digital frames and also in an immersive digital projection room. Analysis of field notes and interviews indicate that the digital frame approach was unsuccessful because of aesthetic and environmental concerns. The immersive projection suggested that more experiential approaches may be more interesting. It is argued that there is an inherent resistance in digital media to previous models of art commoditization. None of the approaches discussed here resolve the dilemma but rather indicate the scope and complexity of the issues.

[1]  Rishab Ghosh.  A Renaissance of the Commons: How the New Sciences and Internet are Framing a New Global Identity and Order , 2006 .

[2]  R. Hughes.  The Shock of the New : Art and the Century of Change , 1980 .

[3]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[4]  W. Benjamin.  The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction , 2018, A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage.

[5]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  The Gift of the Gab?: A Design Oriented Sociology of Young People's Use of Mobiles , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Slavoj Žižek,et al.  Living in the end times , 2010 .

[9]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Digital originals: reproduction as a space for design , 2012, NordiCHI.

[10]  Jaron Lanier,et al.  You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto , 2010 .

[11]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[12]  William Lidwell,et al.  Universal Principles of Design , 2003 .

[13]  Miguel Bruns Alonso,et al.  MusicCube: making digital music tangible , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[14]  Ioana Boghian.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , 2013 .

[15]  Sergi Jordà,et al.  Tangible jukebox: back to palpable music , 2010, TEI '10.

[16]  Jörgen Skågeby,et al.  Gift-giving as a conceptual framework: framing social behavior in online networks , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[18]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Creativity in Amateur Multimedia: Popular Culture, Critical Theory, and HCI , 2007 .

[19]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[20]  J. Briggs,et al.  Post Anxiety Art: economies and cultures of digital painting , 2012 .

[21]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[22]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Photography: A Middle-Brow Art , 1990 .

[23]  Mark Blythe,et al.  No Oil Painting: digital originals and slow prints , 2012 .

[24]  Rishab Ghosh.  CODE : collaborative ownership and the digital economy , 2005 .