PHOTON2: A web-based professional development model for photonics technology education

In this paper, we present a web-based teacher professional development model for photonics technology education funded by the National Science Foundation Advanced Technology Education (ATE) program. In response to the rapidly growing demand for skilled photonics technicians, the PHOTON2 project will increase the number of high school teachers and community college faculty across the US proficient in teaching photonics technology at their own institutions. The project will also focus on building the capacity of educators to engage in lifelong learning through web-based professional development. Unlike the traditional professional development model whereby educators receive training through intensive short-term workshops, the PHOTON2 project team has developed a pedagogical framework designed specifically for adult learners in which technical content, curriculum development, and learner self-regulatory development are integrated into an active, collaborative, and sustained online learning environment. In Spring 2004, two cohorts of science and technology educators, career/guidance counselors, and industry mentors from eleven states including California, Pennsylvania, Texas, Arizona, Hawaii, and the six New England states commenced participation in the three-year project. Qualitative and quantitative research, focused on individual and environmental factors related to web-based learning, will examine the viability of web-based teacher/faculty professional development in engineering technology education.

[1]  Donovan A. McFarlane,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels , 2006 .

[2]  Nicholas Massa,et al.  The light fantastic: PHOTON materials for technician education , 2003, International Topical Meeting on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics.

[3]  B. Zimmerman.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview , 2002 .

[4]  Ida,et al.  Teacher Learning: New Policies, New Practices , 1996 .

[5]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Self-Regulation through Goal Setting. ERIC/CASS Digest. , 2001 .

[6]  Karol I. Pelc,et al.  The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks , 1996 .

[7]  M. Boekaerts.  SELF-REGULATED LEARNING: A NEW CONCEPT EMBRACED BY RESEARCHERS, POLICY MAKERS, EDUCATORS, TEACHERS, AND STUDENTS , 1997 .

[8]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. , 1997 .

[9]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Ability and Task Difficulty in Cognitive Psychology , 1981 .

[10]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Assessing metacognitive awareness , 1994 .

[11]  Kathryn Ley,et al.  Instructional principles for self-regulation , 2001 .

[12]  Strategies To Support Self-Directed Learning in a Web-Based Course. , 2000 .

[13]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective , 1996 .

[14]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[15]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Collaborative Learning In Asynchronous Learning Networks: Building Learning Communities , 1998, WebNet.

[16]  J. Flavell.  Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition , 1987 .

[17]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Morris T. Keeton,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency in Higher Education for Adults: A Guide for Fostering Learning , 2002 .

[19]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Development of Problem Solving , 1994 .

[21]  A. Brown.  Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[22]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[23]  Katherine S. Cennamo,et al.  Evolution of a Web-Enhanced Course: Incorporating Strategies for Self-Regulation , 2002 .

[24]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Capturing Teachers’ Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Professional Development in Mathematics , 2001 .

[25]  Diane Hedin,et al.  School-Based Community Service: What We Know from Research and Theory. , 1991 .

[26]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[27]  D. Gentner,et al.  Reasoning and learning by analogy. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[28]  J Zeleznikow,et al.  FLORENCE: synthesis of case-based and model-based reasoning in a nursing care planning system. , 1993, Computers in nursing.

[29]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[30]  Proficiency theory of adult learning , 1980 .

[31]  D. Schunk.  Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. , 1994 .

[32]  Mark McMahon.  Designing an On-Line Environment to Scaffold Cognitive Self-Regulation , 2002 .