Evaluation of an open-field autorefractor's ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes

Background To evaluate the accuracy of an open-field autorefractor compared with subjective refraction in pseudophakes and hence its ability to assess objective eye focus with intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Objective refraction was measured at 6 m using the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K open-field autorefractor (five repeats) and by subjective refraction on 141 eyes implanted with a spherical (Softec1 n=53), aspherical (SoftecHD n=37) or accommodating (1CU n=22; Tetraflex n=29) IOL. Autorefraction was repeated 2 months later. Results The autorefractor prescription was similar (average difference: 0.09±0.53 D; p=0.19) to that found by subjective refraction, with ∼71% within ±0.50 D. The horizontal cylindrical components were similar (difference: 0.00±0.39 D; p=0.96), although the oblique (J45) autorefractor cylindrical vector was slightly more negative (by −0.06±0.25 D; p=0.06) than the subjective refraction. The results were similar for each of the IOL designs except for the spherical IOL, where the mean spherical equivalent difference between autorefraction and subjective was more hypermetropic than the Tetraflex accommodating IOL (F=2.77, p=0.04). The intrasession repeatability was <0.55 D (95% CI) and intersession repeatability <0.50 D in ≥85%. Conclusions The autorefractor gives valid and repeatable measures of pseudophakic eye refraction and hence objective accommodation.

[1]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Optimizing measurement of subjective amplitude of accommodation with defocus curves , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Comparison of pilocarpine-induced and stimulus-driven accommodation in phakic eyes. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[3]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Continuous measurement of accommodation in human factor applications , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  A. Glasser,et al.  Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  R. Hennessy,et al.  Instrument myopia. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[8]  Sunil Shah,et al.  Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  David Miller Instrument myopia: by RT Hennessy. J Opt Soc Am 65:1114–1121, 1975 , 1976 .

[10]  R E Fusaro,et al.  The Repeatability of Automated and Clinician Refraction , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Leon N Davies,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM‐5500 , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  Bernard Gilmartin,et al.  Dynamic Measurement of Accommodation and Pupil Size Using the Portable Grand Seiko FR-5000 Autorefractor , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[16]  L. Thibos,et al.  Power Vectors: An Application of Fourier Analysis to the Description and Statistical Analysis of Refractive Error , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  James S. Wolffsohn,et al.  Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor , 2001 .

[18]  D. Spalton,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin‐Nippon NVision‐K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.