Interactive Prosodic Marking of Focus, Boundary and Newness in Mandarin

The current study investigates whether and how focus, phrase boundary and newness can be simultaneously marked in speech prosody in Mandarin Chinese. Homophones were used to construct three syntactic structures that differed only in boundary condition, focus was elicited by preceding questions, while newness of postboundary words was manipulated as whether they had occurred in the previous text. Systematic analysis of F0 and duration showed that (1) duration was a reliable correlate of boundary strength regardless of focus location, while involvement of F0 was only in terms of lowering of phrase-final F0 minima and raising of phrase-initial F0 minima at a relatively strong boundary, (2) postfocus compression (PFC) of F0 was applied across all boundaries, including those with long silent pauses (over 200 ms), and postfocus F0 was lowered to almost the same degree in all boundary conditions, and (3) newness of postfocus words had no systematic effect on F0 or duration. These results indicate that not only functionally focus is independent of prosodic structure and newness, but also phonetically its realization is separate from boundary marking. Focus is signaled mainly through pitch range adjustments, which can occur even across phrase breaks, whereas boundaries are mostly signaled by duration adjustments.

[1]  S G Nooteboom,et al.  What Makes Speakers Omit Pitch Accents ? An Experiment , 1982, Phonetica.

[2]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  D. K. Oller,et al.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Yiya Chen.  Focus and intonational phrase boundary in standard Chinese , 2004, 2004 International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing.

[5]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[6]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[7]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[8]  Martti Vainio,et al.  The Production and Perception of Focus in Finnish , 2003 .

[9]  Sónia Frota,et al.  Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English , 2005 .

[10]  Yi Xu,et al.  Prosodic encoding and perception of focus in Tibetan (anduo dialect) , 2012, Speech Prosody 2012.

[11]  Haruo Kubozono.  The organization of Japanese prosody , 1987 .

[12]  Angelien Sanderman,et al.  On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues , 1994 .

[13]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  CONTRASTIVE FOCUS, GIVENNESS AND THE UNMARKED STATUS OF "DISCOURSE-NEW"* , 2008 .

[14]  Shinichiro Ishihara,et al.  Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing , 2011 .

[15]  G. Bruce,et al.  ACCENTUATION AND TIMING IN SWEDISH , 1983 .

[16]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[17]  Cécile Fougeron,et al.  Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[18]  I. Lehiste,et al.  Role of duration in disambiguating syntactically ambiguous sentences , 1975 .

[19]  S. Jun,et al.  Towards a model of intonational phonology of Turkish: Neutral intonation , 2013 .

[20]  Haruo Kubozono,et al.  Focus and Intonation in Japanese: Does Focus Trigger Pitch Reset? * , 2005 .

[21]  Sónia Frota,et al.  Prosodies : with special reference to Iberian languages , 2005 .

[22]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[23]  Yi Xu.  Timing and coordination in tone and intonation — An articulatory-functional perspective , 2007 .

[24]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Types of focus in English , 2008 .

[25]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure , 1996 .

[26]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[27]  Caroline Vieri Fery,et al.  Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci , 2006 .

[28]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Phonological and Phonetic Effects of Minor Phrase Length on f0 in Japanese , 2004 .

[29]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[30]  Yufang Yang,et al.  Distinguish between focus and newness: An ERP study , 2014, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[31]  S. Jun.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody , 2018 .

[32]  Dwight L. Bolinger.  INTONATION AND GRAMMAR , 1958 .

[33]  Dmitry Sityaev,et al.  Phonetic and Phonological Correlates of Broad, Narrow and Contrastive Focus in English , 2003 .

[34]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Prosodic Realization of Discourse Topic in Mandarin Chinese: Comparing Professional with Non-professional Speakers , 2011, ICPhS.

[35]  Gillian R Brown,et al.  Prosodic Structure and the Given/New Distinction , 1983 .

[36]  M. Pell.  Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  D. Ladd.  Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances , 1988 .

[38]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.

[39]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[40]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[41]  Barbara Gawronska,et al.  FOCUS IDENTIFICATION IN ENGLISH, GREEK AND SWEDISH , 1999 .

[42]  Mariko Sugahara,et al.  Post‐focus prosodic phrase boundaries in Tokyo Japanese: asymmetric behavior of an f0 cue and domain‐final lengthening* , 2005 .

[43]  D. Duez.  Silent and Non-Silent Pauses in Three Speech Styles , 1982 .

[44]  N. Umeda.  F0 Declination is situation dependent , 1980 .

[45]  W. Cooper,et al.  Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Bei Wang,et al.  Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family? , 2012 .

[47]  Alan C. L. Yu,et al.  Morpheme-like prosodic functions: Evidence from acoustic analysis and computational modeling , 2013 .

[48]  W F Katz,et al.  Duration and fundamental frequency correlates of phrase boundaries in productions by children and adults. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Wallace L. Chafe,et al.  Language and Consciousness. , 1974 .

[50]  Yi Xu,et al.  Production of Weak Elements in Speech – Evidence from F₀ Patterns of Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese , 2006, Phonetica.

[51]  K. D. Jong.  The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[52]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Yi Xu,et al.  Differential prosodic encoding of topic and focus in sentence-initial position in Mandarin Chinese , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[54]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1991, CL.

[55]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: final lengthening and silent interval duration , 1995 .

[56]  S. Nooteboom,et al.  Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[58]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[59]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of given-new information , 1981 .

[60]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[61]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation , 1991, HLT.

[62]  Palmer,et al.  English Intonation; With Systematic Exercises , 2007 .

[63]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[64]  G. Fant,et al.  Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report Quantal theory of speech timing , 2007 .

[65]  Santitham Prom-on,et al.  Modeling tone and intonation in Mandarin and English as a process of target approximation. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Deaccentuation of Words Representing ‘Given’ Information: Effects of Persistence of Grammatical Function and Surface Position , 1994 .

[67]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[68]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  Intonation, Perception, And Language , 1967 .

[69]  Yi Xu,et al.  Organizing syllables into groups - Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[70]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[71]  Qian Wu,et al.  Prosodic Realization of Focus in Statement and Question in Tibetan (Lhasa Dialect) , 2012, INTERSPEECH.

[72]  Yi Xu,et al.  Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions , 2005, Speech Commun..

[73]  Francis Nolan,et al.  The role of pitch and timing cues in the perception of phrasal grouping in Seoul Korean. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Phonetic Implementation Must Be Learnt: Native versus Chinese Realization of Focus Accent in Dutch , 2011, ICPhS.

[75]  Yi Xu,et al.  Timing and coordination in tone and intonation―An articulatory-functional perspective , 2009 .

[76]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[77]  M. Swerts.  Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure , 1998 .

[78]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[79]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[80]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Pitch Accent in Context: Predicting Intonational Prominence from Text , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[81]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[82]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  The Parsing of Prosody , 1996 .

[83]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[84]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[85]  M. Swerts,et al.  Prosody as a Marker of Information Flow in Spoken Discourse , 1994 .

[86]  S. Baumann,et al.  TONAL AND ARTICULATORY MARKING OF FOCUS IN GERMAN , 2007 .

[87]  Canan Ipek,et al.  Phonetic Realization of Focus with No On-focus Pitch Range Expansion in Turkish , 2011, ICPhS.

[88]  Heete Sahkai,et al.  Prosody of contrastive focus in estonian , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[89]  Armin Mester,et al.  Prosodic subcategories in Japanese , 2013 .

[90]  Fang Liu,et al.  Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation , 2005, Phonetica.

[91]  Elisabeth Selkirk.  The Syntax‐Phonology Interface , 2011 .

[92]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[93]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure , 1992, ICSLP.

[94]  E. Prince.  The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[95]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Measuring the effect of fundamental frequency raising as a strategy for increasing vocal intensity in soft, normal and loud phonation , 2002, Speech Commun..

[96]  F. Kügler,et al.  On the elicitation of focus – Prosodic differences as a function of sentence mode of the context? , 2014 .

[97]  J. Terken.  The Distribution of Pitch Accents in Instructions as a Function of Discourse Structure , 1984 .

[98]  W. Cooper,et al.  Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[99]  M. Swerts.  Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[100]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  F/sub 0/ declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[101]  B. Rosner,et al.  Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[102]  D. Bolinger.  Accent Is Predictable (If You're a Mind-Reader) , 1972 .

[103]  Yi Xu,et al.  Revisiting focus prosody in Japanese , 2012 .

[104]  J. O'connor.  Intonation Of Colloquial English , 1961 .

[105]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[106]  Rpg Rene Collier,et al.  Focus Conditions and the Prominence of Pitch-Accented Syllables , 1996 .

[107]  Hiroyuki Nagahara,et al.  Phonological phrasing in Japanese , 1994 .

[108]  Yi Xu,et al.  Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0contours , 1999 .

[109]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Basic notions of information structure , 2008 .

[110]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[111]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  F0 declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech , 1996, ICSLP.

[112]  K. D. de Jong.  The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[113]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English , 2012 .

[114]  Cinzia Avesani,et al.  Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis , 2002, J. Phonetics.