Strong interseismic coupling, fault afterslip, and viscoelastic flow before and after the Oct. 9, 1995 Colima‐Jalisco earthquake: Continuous GPS measurements from Colima, Mexico

[1] Continuous GPS measurements from Colima, Mexico during 4/93–6/01, bracketing the Oct. 9, 1995 M = 8.0 Colima-Jalisco earthquake, provide new constraints on Rivera plate subduction mechanics. Modeling of margin-normal strain accumulation before the earthquake suggests the Rivera-North America subduction interface was fully locked. Transient postseismic motion from 10/95–6/97 is well fit by a model that includes logarithmically-decaying fault afterslip, elastic strain from shallow fault relocking, and possibly a minor viscoelastic response, but is fit poorly by models that assume a dominant Maxwell viscoelastic response of the lower crust and upper mantle, independent of the assumed viscosities. Landward, margin-normal motion since mid-1997 is parallel to but ∼75% slower than the pre-seismic velocity. Afterslip alone fails to account for this slowdown. The viscoelastic response predicted by a FEM correctly resolves the remaining velocity difference within the uncertainties. Both processes thus offset elastic strain accumulating from the relocked subduction interface.

[1]  Y. Okada.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[2]  C. Demets,et al.  Slip kinematics and dynamics during and after the 1995 October 9 Mw = 8.0 Colima–Jalisco earthquake, Mexico, from GPS geodetic constraints , 2001 .

[3]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[4]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[5]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[6]  Javier F. Pacheco,et al.  Nature of seismic coupling along simple plate boundaries of the subduction type , 1993 .

[7]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone , 2001 .

[8]  T. Masterlark.  Regional fault mechanics following the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2000 .

[9]  S. K. Singh,et al.  The great Jalisco, Mexico, earthquakes of 1932: Subduction of the Rivera plate , 1985 .

[10]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Mantle Flow Beneath a Continental Strike-Slip Fault: Postseismic Deformation After the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake , 2001, Science.

[11]  C. Demets,et al.  Homogeneous vs heterogeneous subduction zone models: Coseismic and postseismic deformation , 2001 .

[12]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The geodetic signature of the M8.0 Oct. 9,1995, Jalisco Subduction Earthquake , 1997 .

[13]  S. Hartzell,et al.  Fault-slip distribution of the 1995 Colima-Jalisco, Mexico, earthquake , 1999 .

[14]  C. Demets,et al.  Comment on "Relative motions of the Pacific, Rivera, North American, and Cocos plates since 0.78 Ma" , 1997 .

[15]  T. Masterlark,et al.  Poroelastic coupling between the 1992 Landers and Big Bear Earthquakes , 2000 .